Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / Our NATO allies are unwilling to play Donald Trump’s game this time around
NATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

April 7, 2026

Our NATO allies are unwilling to play Donald Trump’s game this time around

By Daniel DePetris

Mark Rutte may not be a household name in the Chicago area or the rest of America, but the man is perhaps the only thing standing in the way of a full-blown collision between President Donald Trump and the NATO alliance.
NATO’s secretary-general has emerged as Europe’s most capable Trump whisperer, someone who can fly to Washington at a moment’s notice to talk the mercurial president away from the ledge. Last July, Rutte made a trip to the White House to push for a NATO-financed scheme that would sustain weapons shipments to Kyiv for Ukraine’s war against Russia—following Trump’s infamous blowup with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Rutte pulled it off again in October, when it seemed like Trump would bypass Ukraine to negotiate an end to the war directly with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
What Rutte did back then appears relatively easy compared with the challenge he faces in Washington this week. The relationship between NATO and its most important member, the United States, is shaky. The nearly six-week-long war in Iran may be occurring thousands of miles away from NATO headquarters, but its impacts are reverberating throughout Europe in the form of ballooning fuel prices and the risk of energy shortages. Trump has been in an increasingly agitated state, lobbing barbs at the alliance for refusing to help clear the Strait of Hormuz, the Persian Gulf chokepoint where around 20% of the world’s oil flowed until Iran effectively shuttered it. It may be time, Trump recently said, to consider withdrawing from the organization.

Read at The Chicago Tribune

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

In the mediaNATO, Alliances

Foreign Contractors Stand To Gain As NATO Countries Spend Big On Defense

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

April 16, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Alliances, Iran, Middle East, NATO

Our Adversaries—And Allies—Are Learning These Lessons From U.S.-Iran Negotiations: Analyst

Featuring Daniel DePetris

April 14, 2026

Op-edNATO, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, US‑Israel‑Iran

Threatening NATO Over Iran Is Stupid, but Potentially Useful

By Benjamin Friedman

April 12, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

A Flawed Formula for Peace in Ukraine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

April 7, 2026

In the mediaNATO, Alliances, Iran, Middle East, US‑Israel‑Iran

Trump roils NATO as pressure builds over Strait of Hormuz

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

April 5, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Alliances, Iran, Middle East, NATO

Trump’s ‘Art of the Deal’ Is Losing Friends and Alienating Allies

By Daniel DePetris

April 2, 2026

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.