Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / Europe should defend itself
NATO, Europe and Eurasia

May 29, 2026

Europe should defend itself

By John Grover

The Pentagon recently confirmed it will not deploy Tomahawk missile forces to Germany, leaving Berlin with what its own officials call a missile gap. Within days, Spain called for the European Union to build its own army as their Foreign Minister José Manuel Albares openly worried about whether America could be counted on in a crisis. Albares declared, “This is the moment of the sovereignty and independence of Europe. The Americans are inviting us to that.”

Madrid is right, and Washington should welcome European defence autonomy while stepping back from the continent, rhetorically and materially, as American forces and dollars further shift to higher priorities. We are still at war with Iran after all. And with Russia bogged down in Ukraine, and China remaining the looming threat, Washington needs to refocus from Europe, where the conventional threat is lower.

The decision not to send scarce Tomahawk missiles exposes deficiencies that European capitals had decades to address but did not. Washington’s pullback did not create Germany’s shortfall in land-based missiles that could strike deep into Russia. Berlin’s own choices did. Nearly four years after Berlin approved a special €100 billion “Zeitenwende” defence fund, Germany still struggles with shortages of munitions, drones, air defense, and deployment-ready units. In fact, the German army is today less battle-ready than when the war in Ukraine began.

The same pattern holds across much of the continent: underinvestment in industrial production, hollow ground forces, and lopsided reliance on American logistics and intelligence. If deterrence in Europe fails, it will fail because European governments passed the buck and ignored the defense gaps they have long known about. True, it does not help that America launched another war of choice in the Middle East. But the fact is we live in a world where every country is responsible for their own defence first and foremost.

Read at The Critic

Author

John
Grover

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Zelensky is running out of political cover

By Jennifer Kavanagh

August 20, 2026

Explainer

The role of moral hazard in the Ukraine war

By Christopher McCallion

August 18, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances

Germany’s Military Recruitment Crisis Is About to Test Berlin’s Rhetoric

By Moritz Graefrath

August 14, 2026

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine landmines Ukraine’s ‘turned tide’ doesn’t comport ‘with basic military reality’

Featuring Daniel Davis

July 29, 2026

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine and Iran Wars Are Merging Into One Big Crisis for Trump in This Sea

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 28, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Zelensky’s ‘Freya’ missile defense scheme could backfire. Here’s why.

By Jennifer Kavanagh

July 26, 2026

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.