Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / NATO needs the Germans to be up
NATO, Alliances

March 6, 2026

NATO needs the Germans to be up

By Gil Barndollar

Marco Rubio, the poor man’s Kissinger of our era, drew standing applause in Munich this month—an odd reception for a speech that offered explicit Christian (trans)nationalism. A year before, his colleague and rival J.D. Vance had said similar things, albeit in harsher words. As U.S. missiles pounded Iran this week, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz was muted in his criticism of the latest American military adventure, abjuring any idea of “lecturing our partners.”

After twelve months of both European gestation and American reiteration, in the form of National Security and National Defense Strategies anchored on a pivot to the Western Hemisphere, the dust has started to settle in Europe, even as it rises again in the Middle East. Despite the praise lavished on Rubio by Eurocrats, the continent is finally, fitfully, stumbling towards something like an independent path. Nowhere is that truer than in the land of his German hosts.

As even a casual student of postwar Europe might remember, the Atlantic alliance came into being in 1949 with a triple mission. In the pithy words of its first secretary general, Sir Hastings “Pug” Ismay, NATO was created “to keep the Americans in, the Russians out, and the Germans down.” Three quarters of a century on, all three planks look very wobbly.

Read at The Critic

Author

Photo of Gil Barndollar

Gil
Barndollar

Non-Resident Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

Op-edEurope and Eurasia, NATO

To ensure Europe rearms, bring the troops home

By Anthony Constantini

June 1, 2026

Op-edNATO, Europe and Eurasia

Europe should defend itself

By John Grover

May 29, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Why Trump’s Germany Drawdown is Overdue

By Violet Collins

May 28, 2026

ExplainerBurden sharing, Basing and force posture, Europe and Eurasia

Stop bargaining with Europe, start leaving

By Benjamin Friedman and Moritz Graefrath

May 27, 2026

In the mediaNATO, Europe and Eurasia

U.S. to pull jets, destroyers and submarines from NATO as part of European drawdown

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

May 26, 2026

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, Russia, Ukraine, US‑Israel‑Iran

How the War in Iran Helped Ukraine Go From Problem to Solution

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

May 22, 2026

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.