Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Iran / The U.S. should avoid actions that bring us closer to war with Iran
Iran, Iraq, Middle East

January 2, 2020

The U.S. should avoid actions that bring us closer to war with Iran

By Daniel Davis

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
January 2, 2020
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Tonight, media outlets reported U.S. military strikes killed Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani in Iraq, the latest escalation between Washington and Tehran. Defense Priorities Senior Fellow Lt. Col. Daniel L. Davis, USA, Ret. issued the following statement in response:

“Qassem Soleimani had a lot of blood on his hands, and nobody should mourn his death.

“Following this latest action, every possible precaution should be taken to safeguard U.S. military forces in Iraq, Syria, and throughout the region, who remain vulnerable to retaliatory strikes. The best way to keep U.S. forces safe is to remove them from the region.

“Leaving behind U.S. troops with murky and unclear aims is an unjustified risk. With the defeat of ISIS’s caliphate, all U.S. forces should have long ago been removed.

“Iran is a middling power, easily checked by its neighbors. With limited and diminishing U.S. interests at stake in the Middle East, the U.S. should avoid mistakes that bring us closer to war with Iran. Managing the trouble this strike seems likely to produce will further weaken the United States and entangle it in peripheral conflicts disconnected from U.S. security.”

Author

Photo of Daniel Davis

Daniel
Davis

Senior Fellow & Military Expert

Defense Priorities

More on Iran

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Trump’s Least Bad Option in Iran

By Rosemary Kelanic and Jennifer Kavanagh

May 28, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Trump wants to expand the Abraham Accords. It could sink a deal to end the Iran war.

By Daniel DePetris

May 26, 2026

Q&AIran, Asia, China, China‑Taiwan, Great power competition

Takeaways from Trump’s China Trip

By Lyle Goldstein

May 26, 2026

Press ReleaseUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Israel‑Iran, Middle East

Close the deal, open the strait

By Benjamin Friedman

May 26, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Each side spins a different story about the U.S.-Iran peace talks—but Tehran may have the last word

By Rajan Menon

May 25, 2026

Op-edChina, Asia, China‑Taiwan, Iran, US‑Israel‑Iran

Can the Pentagon beat China if it struggles with Iran?

By Lyle Goldstein

May 25, 2026

Events on Iran

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualHouthis, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Yemen

Houthi conundrum: defend, degrade, or defer

March 28, 2024
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.