Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Western Hemisphere
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / China / Talking to China advances U.S. security
China, Asia

May 9, 2023

Talking to China advances U.S. security

By Lyle Goldstein

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
May 9, 2023
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Yesterday, following a meeting in Beijing with U.S. Ambassador Nicholas Burns, Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang stressed the need for the U.S. and China to stabilize relations. This was the first time the two have met since the balloon incident in February. Defense Priorities Director of Asia Engagement Lyle Goldstein issued the following statement in response:

“A meeting between U.S. Ambassador to China Nicholas Burns and Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang should be routine—that it’s not reflects the unfortunate state of this critical bilateral relationship. An excessively hostile posture toward Beijing, and an assumption that some kind of cold, or even hot, war is unavoidable, has taken hold of Washington’s approach to the Asia-Pacific region, which is bad for both U.S. national security and our country’s economic interests. Both demand a pragmatic working relationship between the world’s two most powerful countries.

“The last meeting between the American and Chinese heads of state took place for just a few hours in Bali about six months ago, but such brief discussions are woefully inadequate. The Biden Administration should give U.S.-China relations the focus and resources it deserves. At a minimum, there should be an annual presidential summit, but this should be accompanied by continuous engagement by the national security establishment, and particularly by America’s chief diplomats. The two sides are certain to disagree on many or even most points, yet the imperative is to seek points of agreement to safeguard American prosperity and, more urgently, to prevent an armed showdown that could entail immeasurable destruction.

“Responsible competition with China would clearly define U.S. vital interests, the challenges and threats China might pose to them, and specific courses of action to advance our national priorities. An ill-defined antagonism is the opposite of strategy, and a reactionary policy that seeks to oppose anything and everything Beijing does risks U.S. exhaustion—and a collision with China, which is in neither country’s interest.”

Author

Photo of Lyle Goldstein

Lyle
Goldstein

Director, Asia Program

Defense Priorities

More on China

op-edChina, Asia

China is the bright spot in Trump’s foreign policy

By Lyle Goldstein

February 12, 2026

In the mediaChina, Asia, Nuclear weapons

A U.S.-Russia nuclear disarmament treaty may benefit U.S.-China relations

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

February 4, 2026

China, Asia

Fate of China’s top general more likely to do with power struggle than corruption

By Lyle Goldstein

January 26, 2026

In the mediaChina, Asia, Military analysis, Naval power

China’s retro submarine design speeds up challenge to U.S. undersea dominance

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

January 23, 2026

op-edGrand strategy, Alliances, China, Greenland, Russia, Western Hemisphere

Russian and Chinese threats to Greenland and the new Arctic sea routes are low

By Lyle Goldstein

January 23, 2026

In the mediaChina‑Taiwan, Asia, China, Taiwan

China, Taiwan, and the cost of american power: Is it worth sacrificing american lives for Taiwan?

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

January 20, 2026

Events on China

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved