Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / Why America’s East Asian allies skipped the NATO summit
NATO, Alliances, Asia

July 2, 2025

Why America’s East Asian allies skipped the NATO summit

By Lyle Goldstein

Donald Trump recently netted a victory at the NATO summit in The Hague, pressuring the alliance into hiking its recommended defense spending minimum from 2 percent of GDP to 5 percent.

Yet a noticeable dissent was registered from America’s closest allies in the Asia-Pacific. The leaders of Australia, Japan, and South Korea all abruptly canceled on the summit. While none are members of NATO, they’d been regularly attending previous summits since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in early 2022.

Many strategists are now fretting over an alleged fraying of America’s alliances in the Pacific. But this seeming strategic readjustment ongoing in all these allied capitals is being done for rational reasons and may signal welcome recalibration in East Asia and even a victory for those who favor restraint in the region.

It’s easy to see why some are concerned. The Biden administration claimed that one of its major foreign policy achievements had been to unify the “free world” against authoritarian aggression. This extremely ideological framing clearly identified China as a prospective adversary—a framing that many East Asian states found excessively polarizing and inflexible.

Read at Real Clear Defense

Author

Photo of Lyle Goldstein

Lyle
Goldstein

Director, Asia Program

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

What’s behind Trump’s Ukraine weapons U-Turn?

By Daniel DePetris

July 9, 2025

op-edUkraine, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

The case for cutting off weapons to Ukraine

By Dan Caldwell

July 6, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

As Pentagon pauses some weapons for Ukraine, experts weigh in on U.S. priorities

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 3, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine

MAGA faithful cheer Trump for pausing Ukraine weapons after bristling at Iran strikes

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 3, 2025

op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

More European defense spending isn’t cause for celebration

By Jennifer Kavanagh

July 2, 2025

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Past Virtual Event: A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

Past Virtual Event: New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024
virtualNATO, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Reexamining the U.S. role in European security

May 3, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved