Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Venezuela
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / Why America’s East Asian allies skipped the NATO summit
NATO, Alliances, Asia

July 2, 2025

Why America’s East Asian allies skipped the NATO summit

By Lyle Goldstein

Donald Trump recently netted a victory at the NATO summit in The Hague, pressuring the alliance into hiking its recommended defense spending minimum from 2 percent of GDP to 5 percent.

Yet a noticeable dissent was registered from America’s closest allies in the Asia-Pacific. The leaders of Australia, Japan, and South Korea all abruptly canceled on the summit. While none are members of NATO, they’d been regularly attending previous summits since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in early 2022.

Many strategists are now fretting over an alleged fraying of America’s alliances in the Pacific. But this seeming strategic readjustment ongoing in all these allied capitals is being done for rational reasons and may signal welcome recalibration in East Asia and even a victory for those who favor restraint in the region.

It’s easy to see why some are concerned. The Biden administration claimed that one of its major foreign policy achievements had been to unify the “free world” against authoritarian aggression. This extremely ideological framing clearly identified China as a prospective adversary—a framing that many East Asian states found excessively polarizing and inflexible.

Read at Real Clear Defense

Author

Photo of Lyle Goldstein

Lyle
Goldstein

Director, Asia Program

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

op-edEurope and Eurasia, NATO

This time, Trump’s threats to Europe look deadly serious

By Daniel DePetris

January 20, 2026

op-edNATO, Europe and Eurasia

Will NATO survive Trump?

By Jennifer Kavanagh

January 20, 2026

In the mediaGlobal posture, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

The meaning of “America First” is in flux

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

January 20, 2026

op-edRussia, Ukraine‑Russia

Seizing empty Russian oil tanker doesn’t serve America’s interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh

January 8, 2026

In the mediaGrand strategy

Daniel Davis discusses the collapse of the ‘rules-based international order’ with Times of London

Featuring Daniel Davis

January 7, 2026

In the mediaGrand strategy, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine‑Russia

Daniel Davis critiques the ‘coalition of the willing’ in Ukraine-Russia war: LBC

Featuring Daniel Davis

January 6, 2026

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024
virtualNATO, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Reexamining the U.S. role in European security

May 3, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved