Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Western Hemisphere
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / China / Abandoning strategic ambiguity could threaten Taiwan and create a U.S.-China crisis
China, China‑Taiwan, Grand strategy, Taiwan

May 23, 2022

Abandoning strategic ambiguity could threaten Taiwan and create a U.S.-China crisis

By Lyle Goldstein

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
May 23, 2022
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, President Joe Biden said the U.S. military would defend Taiwan in the event China attempts to invade the island, an apparent break with U.S. policy, despite the insistence of a White House official that there has been no change in policy. Defense Priorities Director of Asia Engagement Lyle Goldstein issued the following statement in response:

“President Biden’s statement in Tokyo that the U.S. would defend Taiwan militarily in the event of an attack by China represents a reckless departure from the current U.S. policy of ‘strategic ambiguity.’ Ambiguity about U.S. intentions, along with the ‘One China policy,’ has preserved stability in the Taiwan Strait and between the U.S. and China for decades. Given China’s growing military power, its proximity to Taiwan, as well as Beijing’s repeated statements, it is apparent the island represents a ‘core interest’ that China will fight and die over. It is exceedingly risky for the president to abandon ‘strategic ambiguity’ and imprudent to even hint at it, particularly in off-hand remarks.

“Unlike Japan, Taiwan is not an ally of the United States. That is by design, and there is no compelling U.S. vital interest with respect to the island, which China has claimed since 1949, that would justify a U.S.-China war. The risks of a war between the U.S. and nuclear-armed Russia limit our involvement in Ukraine; the same risks and dynamics should guide our Taiwan policy as well. Taiwan, which is not a springboard for Chinese conquest of the Asia-Pacific, can and should do much more to defend itself. Strategic ambiguity is a simple reflection of geographical, military, and political realities. The best way to preserve Taiwan’s autonomy is to stick with strategic ambiguity and the longstanding One China policy.”

Author

Photo of Lyle Goldstein

Lyle
Goldstein

Director, Asia Program

Defense Priorities

More on China

op-edChina, Asia

China is the bright spot in Trump’s foreign policy

By Lyle Goldstein

February 12, 2026

In the mediaChina, Asia, Nuclear weapons

A U.S.-Russia nuclear disarmament treaty may benefit U.S.-China relations

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

February 4, 2026

China, Asia

Fate of China’s top general more likely to do with power struggle than corruption

By Lyle Goldstein

January 26, 2026

In the mediaChina, Asia, Military analysis, Naval power

China’s retro submarine design speeds up challenge to U.S. undersea dominance

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

January 23, 2026

op-edGrand strategy, Alliances, China, Greenland, Russia, Western Hemisphere

Russian and Chinese threats to Greenland and the new Arctic sea routes are low

By Lyle Goldstein

January 23, 2026

In the mediaChina‑Taiwan, Asia, China, Taiwan

China, Taiwan, and the cost of american power: Is it worth sacrificing american lives for Taiwan?

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

January 20, 2026

Events on China

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved