Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / U.S. Tomahawk refusal protects Ukraine from false hope
Ukraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

October 19, 2025

U.S. Tomahawk refusal protects Ukraine from false hope

By Jennifer Kavanagh

It was a big week for President Donald Trump’s attempts to end the war in Ukraine. After a two-hour call with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, Trump met in the White House with Ukraine’s leader, Volodymyr Zelensky on Friday. Pundits are already busy trying to assess who came out ahead. Did Putin’s outreach win Trump back to Russia’s side or does the American President continue to support Ukraine’s efforts to achieve a battlefield victory?

The answer, it seems, is none of the above. Instead, reality is the true winner of the latest diplomatic scramble, having successfully dealt a firm blow to the magical thinking afflicting all major stakeholders in the current war.

The wake-up call was harshest for Zelensky. The Ukrainian delegation came to Washington projecting confidence that President Trump would endorse their plan to go back on the offensive and provide Kyiv with long-range Tomahawk missiles that would allow Ukraine to strike deeper into Russian territory. Trump declined both requests. He said that he hoped the war could be ended without the use of Tomahawks, made no new commitments of military aid, and called on Zelensky to instead make a deal that would bring peace.

Trump’s position should have been expected. Despite all the talk about Tomahawks in Kyiv and in Washington, these missiles were never truly on the table for Ukraine. Not only does Kyiv have no way to launch the long-range missile, but U.S. stockpiles are so constrained that the Pentagon would surely object to giving any up. Trump’s rhetoric around Tomahawks resembled his earlier warnings about harsher sanctions on Russia—a threat that he does not want to make good on.

Read at UnHerd

Author

Jennifer
Kavanagh

Senior Fellow & Director of Military Analysis

Defense Priorities

More on Eurasia

In the mediaEurope and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Ukraine, Russia peace prospects; Trump being optimistic: Lt. Col Daniel Davis | RISING

Featuring Daniel Davis

July 7, 2026

Op-edUkraine, NATO, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

Ukraine is front of mind ahead of the NATO summit spectacle

By Daniel DePetris

July 7, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Zelensky is in denial about Ukraine’s war hopes

By Jennifer Kavanagh

July 6, 2026

Q&AAsia, China, Europe and Eurasia, Great power competition, Russia

How the U.S. pushes China and Russia together

By Lyle Goldstein

June 29, 2026

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine launches 40-day drone strike campaign to pressure Russia to end war | DW News

Featuring Benjamin Friedman

June 27, 2026

Op-edChina, Asia, Russia

The myth of a China-Russia axis

By Lyle Goldstein

June 26, 2026

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.