Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / China / Trump’s Trade War Threatens To Derail U.S.-China Relations
China, Asia

April 17, 2025

Trump’s Trade War Threatens To Derail U.S.-China Relations

By Daniel DePetris

When will President Donald Trump‘s trade war with China end? Will it end? And if it does, who’s to say another American president at some time in the future won’t initiate a new one? Policymakers, traders, business analysts, and prognosticators the world over are trying to answer all of these questions, a remarkably difficult task given the value Trump places on unpredictability. And, true to form, Trump’s salvo of tariffs over the last several weeks—instituting a chaotic reciprocal tariff regime, only to walk it back for 90 days while increasing restrictions on Chinese exports—is the epitome of unpredictability.

Washington and Beijing are now staring at each other waiting for the other to blink. Trump’s tariffs on Chinese goods are now at a whopping 145 percent. Despite carve-outs on certain high-tech products like iPhones as well as Trump’s own confidence that Chinese President Xi Jinping will eventually pick up the phone and make a call to deescalate the situation, Xi isn’t in a talking mood right now. Rather than capitulate or beg for a negotiation, China is retaliating like it did in the past. U.S. goods into China are now slapped with a 125 percent levy; big U.S. companies are being put on Beijing’s “entity list,” limiting their access to certain Chinese products; and the Chinese Communist Party’s propaganda machine is waging a war of words against the United States. On April 13, China suspended exports of some rare earth minerals, and two days later it paused the purchase of Boeing passenger aircraft.

This isn’t Washington and Beijing’s first rodeo. During the first Trump administration, Washington hit about $335 billion worth of Chinese goods with various tariff levels, some higher than others. That years-long dispute eventually ended in 2020, when Trump signed the Phase-1 trade accord that mandated Beijing to purchase tens of billions of dollars in additional U.S. products (Beijing didn’t keep to the terms, due in part to the global COVID-19 pandemic).

The difference between now and then, however, is stark. Back then, U.S. and Chinese officials were still interacting on issues ranging from North Korea’s nuclear weapons program to the fentanyl trade. Today, the trade war between the world’s two largest economies and biggest military spenders is beginning to bleed in other areas of policy. Historically, trade was one segment of the wider bilateral relationship where U.S. and Chinese policymakers could sit in the same room without tearing each other’s eyes out. Now it’s just one more area of extreme competition. The last good leg of the wobbly stool is now wobbly as well.

Read at Newsweek

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edChina, Asia, Grand strategy, Military analysis

Hegseth is taking the Army on another dead end ride to Asia

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 20, 2025

op-edChina, Asia

It’s Time for Trump and Xi to Meet

By Lyle Goldstein

May 17, 2025

op-edAsia

The Trump administration cools off India-Pakistan conflict — for now

By Daniel DePetris

May 13, 2025

op-edChina, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power, Taiwan

China tariffs deal could backfire on Trump

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 12, 2025

op-edAsia, Air power, Nuclear weapons

Will India or Pakistan resort to the nuclear option?

By Rajan Menon

May 8, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

The Pentagon Is Ignoring Its Own Strategy

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 7, 2025

Events on China

See All Events
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Past Virtual Event: Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024
virtualChina, Asia, Grand strategy

Past Virtual Event: Rocks, reefs, and resolve? Examining the purpose of U.S. policy in the South China Sea

December 12, 2023

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved