Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Syria / Trump’s Syria sequel should end better than last time
Syria, Grand strategy, Middle East

February 2, 2025

Trump’s Syria sequel should end better than last time

By Rosemary Kelanic

President Donald Trump recently informed Benjamin Netanyahu’s government in Israel that he intends to withdraw the 2,000 U.S. troops stationed in Syria to combat the remnants of Islamic State, according to Israeli media.

If true, that news is sure to stir the pot in Washington, where Trump’s pledge to remove U.S. troops from Syria in 2019 unleashed histrionics on Capitol Hill—even though by then ISIS had been thoroughly defeated and lost all of its territory.

Unfortunately, Trump’s original directive to leave was sabotaged by Pentagon leaders who snookered the president into believing that U.S. forces needed to stay for Syria’s oil.

But given the emerging tagline of Trump II: “This time it’s personal”—we can only hope the president sticks to his guns through the inevitable pushback to any discussion of withdrawal from Syria. Because despite his eccentric views on other foreign policy topics, such as the Panama Canal and Greenland, Trump’s reluctance on Syria has been spot on.

The simple truth is that Syria is in revolution—and revolutions tend to get much, much worse before they get better. The United States may have only a narrow window to pull out its troops before they are drawn into what Trump has rightly discerned “is not our fight.”

Read at Stars and Stripes

Author

Rosemary
Kelanic

Director, Middle East Program

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

The Gulf states are between Iran and a hard place

By Daniel DePetris

March 24, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Military technological superiority doesn’t preempt the need for strategic planning

By Violet Collins

March 24, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Congress must demand Iran war answers from Trump administration

By Daniel DePetris

March 24, 2026

Op-edIran, Middle East, US‑Israel‑Iran

Killing Iran’s leaders has strengthened the regime

By Daniel DePetris

March 22, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Let Iran be someone else’s problem

By Benjamin Friedman

March 21, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Iraq, Middle East

Trump’s Iran war is like Iraq, whatever he might say

By Daniel DePetris

March 20, 2026

Events on Syria

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.