Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / Threatening NATO Over Iran Is Stupid, but Potentially Useful
NATO, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, US‑Israel‑Iran

April 12, 2026

Threatening NATO Over Iran Is Stupid, but Potentially Useful

By Benjamin Friedman

The U.S. war in Iran may be over, or at least in abeyance, but President Donald Trump isn’t done blaming Europeans for his failure there. A week after threatening to quit NATO over European states’ reluctance to help out, especially in clearing the Strait of Hormuz, and just two days after striking a shaky ceasefire deal, the president was at it again Thursday, berating the strategically obsequious Mark Rutte, NATO’s secretary general, for the allies’ inaction.

After the meeting Trump took to Truth Social, lamenting, in all caps, that “NATO WASN’T THERE WHEN WE NEEDED THEM, AND THEY WON’T BE THERE IF WE NEED THEM AGAIN.” Rutte, for his part, dutifully went about trying to get NATO to pledge some sort of support for a Strait of Hormuz mission. The trouble is that Iran is still effectively blocking the Strait, and few if any European states seem eager to clear it by force, whereas they might agree to patrol it uselessly when the danger has passed. So the ceasefire, even if it lasts, probably won’t protect NATO from Trump’s wrath.

The White House is reportedly considering moving U.S. troops out of the most recalcitrant European nations into more cooperative ones. And Trump continues threatening to simply announce a U.S. exit from the alliance. That prospect caused a cascade of concern last week, with Washington’s transatlanticists insisting that exiting NATO would be catastrophic for American security. Senate leaders hastened to reassure allies that Trump cannot unilaterally pull out. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Chris Coons (D-DE), leaders of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, declared that NATO underpins U.S. security and that “the United States will remain in” it. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) reminded everyone that Marco Rubio, now Secretary of State, sponsored the 2023 law requiring two-thirds of the Senate to sign off before the United States can withdraw from NATO.

Read at The American Conservative

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

A Flawed Formula for Peace in Ukraine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

April 7, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Our NATO allies are unwilling to play Donald Trump’s game this time around

By Daniel DePetris

April 7, 2026

In the mediaNATO, Alliances, Iran, Middle East, US‑Israel‑Iran

Trump roils NATO as pressure builds over Strait of Hormuz

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

April 5, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Alliances, Iran, Middle East, NATO

Trump’s ‘Art of the Deal’ Is Losing Friends and Alienating Allies

By Daniel DePetris

April 2, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, Middle East, US‑Israel‑Iran

Europe is in mutiny against Trump

By Daniel DePetris

April 1, 2026

Q&AAlliances, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, NATO

How will the war in Iran impact U.S.-Europe relations?

By Thomas P. Cavanna

March 31, 2026

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.