Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / The U.S. needs a different approach for rebalancing NATO
NATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

January 16, 2025

The U.S. needs a different approach for rebalancing NATO

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Daniel DePetris

In a wide-ranging press conference less than two weeks before taking office, U.S. President-elect Donald Trump called for Washington’s NATO allies in Europe to increase their defense spending to 5 percent of GDP, well above the 2 percent threshold the alliance established in 2014. The demand is hardly surprising. Trump has long complained about Europe’s willingness to free-ride on U.S. military power, and during his first term he threatened to withdraw from NATO in retaliation for member states’ financial delinquency.

Trump is right that Europeans must do more—and the U.S. less—when it comes to the continent’s defense. But his fixation on spending targets is misguided and works against U.S. and European interests. Instead of reading from a balance sheet, Trump should push Europeans to finally step outside the U.S. security umbrella and start building the military capabilities and critical enablers they need to independently ensure their security without U.S. assistance.

Read at World Politics Review

Authors

Jennifer
Kavanagh

Senior Fellow & Director of Military Analysis

Defense Priorities

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

In the mediaNATO, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

As Russia and Ukraine press drone war, NATO finds itself caught in crossfire

Featuring Benjamin Friedman

June 5, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

Trump’s European nuclear weapons plan risks backfiring

By Daniel DePetris

June 4, 2026

Q&AEurope and Eurasia, Alliances, Basing and force posture, NATO

Why Washington needs to withdraw from Europe

By Benjamin Friedman

June 4, 2026

Op-edEurope and Eurasia, NATO

To ensure Europe rearms, bring the troops home

By Anthony Constantini

June 1, 2026

Op-edNATO, Europe and Eurasia

Europe should defend itself

By John Grover

May 29, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Why Trump’s Germany Drawdown is Overdue

By Violet Collins

May 28, 2026

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.