Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / The U.S. needs a different approach for rebalancing NATO
NATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

January 16, 2025

The U.S. needs a different approach for rebalancing NATO

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Daniel DePetris

In a wide-ranging press conference less than two weeks before taking office, U.S. President-elect Donald Trump called for Washington’s NATO allies in Europe to increase their defense spending to 5 percent of GDP, well above the 2 percent threshold the alliance established in 2014. The demand is hardly surprising. Trump has long complained about Europe’s willingness to free-ride on U.S. military power, and during his first term he threatened to withdraw from NATO in retaliation for member states’ financial delinquency.

Trump is right that Europeans must do more—and the U.S. less—when it comes to the continent’s defense. But his fixation on spending targets is misguided and works against U.S. and European interests. Instead of reading from a balance sheet, Trump should push Europeans to finally step outside the U.S. security umbrella and start building the military capabilities and critical enablers they need to independently ensure their security without U.S. assistance.

Read at World Politics Review

Authors

Jennifer
Kavanagh

Senior Fellow & Director of Military Analysis

Defense Priorities

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

Q&AAlliances, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, NATO

How will the war in Iran impact U.S.-Europe relations?

By Thomas P. Cavanna

March 31, 2026

Op-edNATO, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

Why the U.S. Should Support a European Nuclear Deterrent

By Thomas P. Cavanna

March 24, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Europe and Eurasia, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Russia and Ukraine trade attacks as the Iran war pulls U.S. attention away

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

March 23, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, Middle East

The U.S. war on Iran could make Europe even more dependent on Washington

By Thomas P. Cavanna

March 17, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, US‑Israel‑Iran

Is Ukraine peace toast, now that the Middle East is on fire?

By Jennifer Kavanagh

March 9, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances

NATO needs the Germans to be up

By Gil Barndollar

March 6, 2026

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.