Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / Why the U.S. Should Support a European Nuclear Deterrent
NATO, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

March 24, 2026

Why the U.S. Should Support a European Nuclear Deterrent

By Thomas P. Cavanna

In a long-awaited speech delivered on March 4, French President Emmanuel Macron outlined a vision for adapting France’s nuclear policy to Europe’s rapidly changing security environment. Among other innovations, Macron introduced the concept of “forward deterrence,” designed to encompass “the depth of the European continent.” He announced that France would expand its nuclear arsenal, modernize its nuclear assets, and increase the opacity of its nuclear program.

Although the emergence of an independent European nuclear deterrent remains a distant prospect, Washington should support France’s initiative to help its allies work toward this meaningful burden-shifting goal.

Discussions about a regional deterrent arise from Russia’s war in Ukraine and repeated nuclear threats. However, they also reflect concerns about the Trump administration’s ambiguity (and occasional hostility) toward NATO, its desire to shift focus to the Western Hemisphere, the Indo-Pacific, and now the Middle East, and the risk that domestic U.S. tensions could become overwhelming. Europeans fear that an official American disengagement or an accumulation of “ambiguit[ies], delays, and mixed signals” could create a “deterrence gap,” thereby inviting an adversary to engage in dangerous provocations to test Europe’s capabilities and resolve.

France’s “forward deterrence” falls short of the nuclear guarantee that the United States has offered to its NATO allies since the Cold War. Additionally, Paris will retain full control over its nuclear planning, targeting, and use.

Read at National Interest

Author

Thomas P.
Cavanna

Non-Resident Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

In the mediaNATO, Alliances

Foreign Contractors Stand To Gain As NATO Countries Spend Big On Defense

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

April 16, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Alliances, Iran, Middle East, NATO

Our Adversaries—And Allies—Are Learning These Lessons From U.S.-Iran Negotiations: Analyst

Featuring Daniel DePetris

April 14, 2026

Op-edNATO, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, US‑Israel‑Iran

Threatening NATO Over Iran Is Stupid, but Potentially Useful

By Benjamin Friedman

April 12, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

A Flawed Formula for Peace in Ukraine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

April 7, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Our NATO allies are unwilling to play Donald Trump’s game this time around

By Daniel DePetris

April 7, 2026

In the mediaNATO, Alliances, Iran, Middle East, US‑Israel‑Iran

Trump roils NATO as pressure builds over Strait of Hormuz

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

April 5, 2026

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.