Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Venezuela
    • China
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / The Kursk incursion might be Ukraine’s ‘Gettysburg’ offensive
Ukraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

August 30, 2024

The Kursk incursion might be Ukraine’s ‘Gettysburg’ offensive

By Anthony Constantini

In 1863, Confederate General Robert E. Lee had a daring idea: move into western Pennsylvania, weaken northern morale, and potentially even strike Washington, D.C. But the attack stalled, ultimately being repulsed at the Battle of Gettysburg, which became known as the “high-water mark” of the Confederacy.

The Russo-Ukrainian War was far different from the American Civil War, and Ukraine was, of course, not anything morally resembling the Confederate States of America. Unfortunately for Ukraine, their recent incursion north into Kursk bears striking resemblances to Lee’s ill-fated attempt.

Before the incursion, the war was simply not going well for Ukraine, whilst they had significant early successes in the conflict, most notably the Battle for Kyiv and the late 2022 Kharkiv counteroffensive, 2023 saw the war become something of a stalemate. But 2024 has borne witness to Russia slowly, but surely, making gains. Those gains have been small, and Russian success is measured by kilometers at a time—but it is objectively success. As a result, even strong allies across the West, including prominent staunchly pro-Ukraine Democrats, were starting to loudly murmur about the need for peace and were expressing frustration with the lack of any sign of negotiations.

The Kursk attack has silenced those murmurs; Ukraine seems to be on the upswing, and no ally will speak up against it now. Ukraine reportedly wants to use the land it has seized as a bargaining chip to get back its land, and analysts are arguing Vladimir Putin’s days may be numbered. Putin has been relatively silent about the attack—surely something must be afoot in the Kremlin, or so goes the argument.

Read at The National Interest

Author

Photo of Anthony Constantini

Anthony
Constantini

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Eurasia

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine

America’s magical thinking on Ukraine and North Korea

Featuring Daniel Davis

November 3, 2025

In the mediaNuclear weapons, China, Russia

Will Trump actually test nuclear weapons? Experts are ‘disturbed’ and urge clarification

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

October 30, 2025

In the mediaNuclear weapons, China, Russia

Trump orders Pentagon to ‘immediately’ begin nuclear weapons testing, analysts warn of arms race

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

October 30, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia

Europe’s persistence in supporting Ukraine is bearing fruit

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

October 24, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

New oil sanctions will not stop Russia’s war machine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

October 23, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Russia’s oil giants get sanctioned by the US. Will it hurt the Kremlin’s war on Ukraine? (For now, no)

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

October 23, 2025

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved