Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / The case for the U.S. to stop babying Europe on National Security
NATO, Europe and Eurasia

February 29, 2024

The case for the U.S. to stop babying Europe on National Security

By Daniel DePetris

Earlier this month, during a campaign stop in South Carolina, former president and presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump went off on NATO, one of his favorite punching bags. “NATO was busted until I came along,” Trump asserted. “I said, ‘Everybody’s going to pay.’ They said, ‘Well, if we don’t pay, are you still going to protect us?’ I said, ‘Absolutely not.’ They couldn’t believe the answer.” To emphasize the point, Trump stated he would encourage Russia to do “whatever the hell they want” to NATO allies that fall short of the alliance’s defense-spending standards.

The fallout was swift. Julianne Smith, the U.S. ambassador to NATO, called Trump’s remarks “irrational and dangerous.” Democratic lawmakers on Capitol Hill were aghast, while others downplayed the comments as an attempt by Trump to scare the Europeans into boosting their defense budgets. During the annual Munich Security Conference in Germany this month, Trump’s words, and the prospect of a second Trump presidency, hovered over the transatlantic dignitaries like a bad cold.

Yet in the weeks since, those few sentences in South Carolina have prompted a prevailing sense of urgency in European capitals. Even those who find Trump’s rhetoric boorish and alarming note that he has a point: European defense industries have been left to atrophy since the Soviet Union collapsed more than 30 years ago and are ramping up only now, after two years of war in Ukraine. “It’s high time for Europe to improve its own deterrence capacities and take its security into its own hands,” senior European Parliament lawmaker Valérie Hayer claimed. Dutch defense minister Kajsa Ollongren agreed, stating matter-of-factly that “Europe indeed needs to take more responsibility for its own security.” European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen is even basing her reelection campaign on beefing up the institution’s capacity to spend more and “spend better.”

Read at National Review

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

In the mediaNATO, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

As Russia and Ukraine press drone war, NATO finds itself caught in crossfire

Featuring Benjamin Friedman

June 5, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

Trump’s European nuclear weapons plan risks backfiring

By Daniel DePetris

June 4, 2026

Q&AEurope and Eurasia, Alliances, Basing and force posture, NATO

Why Washington needs to withdraw from Europe

By Benjamin Friedman

June 4, 2026

Op-edEurope and Eurasia, NATO

To ensure Europe rearms, bring the troops home

By Anthony Constantini

June 1, 2026

Op-edNATO, Europe and Eurasia

Europe should defend itself

By John Grover

May 29, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Why Trump’s Germany Drawdown is Overdue

By Violet Collins

May 28, 2026

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.