Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / Zelensky-Trump meeting produced no winners
Ukraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

December 29, 2025

Zelensky-Trump meeting produced no winners

By Jennifer Kavanagh

For the fourth time in 2025, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky travelled this weekend to the United States to meet with Donald Trump, arriving at Mar-a-Lago yesterday. Onlookers could be forgiven for feeling a sense of déjà vu about this latest round of diplomacy over the Russia-Ukraine war.

As on his previous visits, Zelensky came hoping to extract commitments from the US on security guarantees and promises of post-war economic and military support for his weary nation. Once again, his meeting with the American side was preempted by a phone call between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, which occurred just hours earlier. Once again, Trump and Zelensky consulted European leaders. And once again, Zelensky left mostly empty-handed.

Though all sides called the discussions “constructive”, the day had no winners. Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart on the terms of a deal, and Washington’s ad hoc approach to brokering an agreement has largely failed. As the year ends, peace in Ukraine seems barely closer than when Trump returned to the White House 11 months ago. A radical change in strategy will be required if his administration hopes for a better result in 2026.

The purpose of yesterday’s meeting was to discuss the “20-point peace plan”, negotiated over recent weeks between the US, Ukrainian, and European delegations and said to represent a convergence of the American and Ukrainian positions. The meeting was doomed before it began, and still managed to disappoint.

Read at UnHerd

Author

Jennifer
Kavanagh

Senior Fellow & Director of Military Analysis

Defense Priorities

More on Eurasia

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, Middle East

The costs of Trump’s contempt are starting to show

Featuring Daniel DePetris

April 24, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

A Flawed Formula for Peace in Ukraine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

April 7, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Europe and Eurasia, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Russia and Ukraine trade attacks as the Iran war pulls U.S. attention away

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

March 23, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

Russia Wins the War on Iran

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

March 14, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

Iran war has given Putin leverage over Trump

By Jennifer Kavanagh

March 12, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, US‑Israel‑Iran

Is Ukraine peace toast, now that the Middle East is on fire?

By Jennifer Kavanagh

March 9, 2026

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.