Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Burden sharing / The burden-sharing dilemma in U.S. alliances
Burden sharing, Grand strategy

June 16, 2024

The burden-sharing dilemma in U.S. alliances

By Brian Blankenship

Few aspects of U.S. alliances are as contested as defense burden sharing. While often associated with Donald Trump, U.S. efforts to pressure its allies to assume more responsibility for their own defense are as old as American alliances themselves. President John F. Kennedy, for example, warned in 1963 that the United States “cannot continue to pay for the military protection of Europe while the NATO states are not paying their fair share.”

Efforts to encourage allied contributions are beset by twin challenges. With too little burden sharing, the United States must cover the costs of defense alone or else risk failing to deter adversaries. With too much, Washington risks losing influence over its allies. These challenges present differently in the two primary regions where the United States has formal military alliances: Europe and the Indo-Pacific.

Read at Lawfare

Author

Brian
Blankenship

Non-Resident Fellow

Defense Priorities

The Latest

Op-edUkraine, NATO, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

Ukraine is front of mind ahead of the NATO summit spectacle

By Daniel DePetris

July 7, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Trump Needs to Stay the Course on Iran Diplomacy

By William Walldorf

July 7, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Zelensky is in denial about Ukraine’s war hopes

By Jennifer Kavanagh

July 6, 2026

Q&ANATO, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia

Washington should retrench and let Europe rearm

By Thomas P. Cavanna

July 6, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Iran war may deliver U.S. a diplomatic silver lining

By Daniel DePetris

July 4, 2026

Op-edEurope and Eurasia, NATO

Misguided and Misunderstood: Trump’s Approach to U.S. Troops in Europe

By Benjamin Friedman

July 3, 2026

Events on Burden sharing

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualGrand strategy, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, Global posture, Military analysis

National Defense Strategy: Underfunded or overstretched?

October 31, 2024
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Donate
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.