Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Russia / Moscow talks expose the fantasy of a fair peace deal
Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

December 3, 2025

Moscow talks expose the fantasy of a fair peace deal

By Jennifer Kavanagh

Following a five-hour meeting in Moscow last night between Vladimir Putin, US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, there have still been no major breakthroughs to end Russia’s war in Ukraine.

This should come as no surprise, even if it is a disappointment to those whose hopes for peace were raised by the bullish optimism of Trump administration officials. It would be wrong, however, to call the latest round of talks a failure. It served an important purpose, shoving into the spotlight three unforgiving but fundamental realities that must inform future efforts to end the conflict.

Firstly, despite much positive spin, no progress has been made on finding workable solutions to address the war’s core issues: namely territory, security guarantees, and the capabilities and alignment of Ukraine’s future military. For its part, Kyiv has refused to cede the rest of Donetsk and continues to insist on security guarantees that exceed those the United States is willing to offer, or which Europe can provide. In addition, most now recognise that Nato membership for Ukraine is off the table, though the country’s leadership is loath to formally commit to this.

Russia’s position is equally unyielding, and Putin’s confidence has only grown after the controversial US 28-point peace plan caused a panic among Washington’s Nato allies. After Witkoff’s meeting with Putin, for instance, Kremlin foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov indicated that proposed U.S. territorial compromises were unacceptable. The Russian President has similarly held fast to his demand that any settlement enforce a neutral Ukraine which cannot pose a military threat to Moscow.

Read at UnHerd

Author

Jennifer
Kavanagh

Senior Fellow & Director of Military Analysis

Defense Priorities

More on Eurasia

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine wants to make its own Patriot missiles. That’s a bad idea.

By Jennifer Kavanagh

June 23, 2026

ExplainerNATO, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia

Let Europe rearm: Capitalize on NATO’s five percent pledge

By Thomas P. Cavanna

June 23, 2026

ExplainerAlliances, Asia, China, Europe and Eurasia, Russia

Assessing the China-Russia quasi-alliance

By Lyle Goldstein

June 16, 2026

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s newest attack drones are delivering the kind of strikes that its HIMARS couldn’t for years

Featuring Gil Barndollar

June 16, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump is blowing his chance to make peace in Ukraine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

June 16, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Russian shadow fleet tanker seizure is political theater

By Jennifer Kavanagh

June 15, 2026

Events on Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Donate
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.