Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Alliances / Swedish NATO membership should entail deeper alliance reforms
Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, NATO

July 10, 2023

Swedish NATO membership should entail deeper alliance reforms

By Zachary Weiss

Despite Sweden’s need for Turkish support in its NATO membership bid, Sweden permitted a protester to burn a Quran outside of a Mosque in Stockholm. Though Turkey may further delay Sweden’s bid, it seems Stockholm is destined to join the alliance, even if its success does not come at the upcoming Vilnius Summit.

Even without membership, Sweden is vying for NATO’s protection. Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson recently announced that his country will allow NATO troops to operate within its borders. Despite Sweden’s robust defensive agreements, gaining an elevated alliance with the United States seems to be the nation’s goal. But instead of turning Sweden into yet another U.S. security burden, a growing military alliance should prompt a rethink of what the U.S. commitment looks like.

Membership in NATO would grant Sweden an Article V defensive pact with the United States – making the partnership as strong as they get. But the United States should carefully consider whether a conventional military obligation to Sweden is in its best interest. A full commitment to Swedish security should not absolve Sweden of its responsibility to protect itself, like the rest of Western Europe.

Read at RealClearWorld

Author

Zachary
Weiss

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Analysis: Putin in negotiations with U.S. presidents over the years

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

May 27, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump should not demand a ceasefire in Putin call

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 19, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Don’t Blame Trump If He Gives Up on Russia-Ukraine

By Daniel DePetris

May 17, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Russia, Ukraine

It’s time for America to walk away completely from Ukraine–Russia

By Anthony Constantini

May 16, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Russia, Ukraine

Daniel Davis on NewsNation discusses the roadblocks in Ukraine-Russia peace talks

Featuring Daniel Davis

May 15, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine War: Why Demanding Putin’s Unconditional Ceasefire is a Mistake

By Daniel Davis

May 12, 2025

Events on Alliances

See All Events
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Alliances, Diplomacy, Israel, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Assessing a formal U.S.-Saudi alliance

October 17, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Past Virtual Event: A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved