Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Venezuela
    • China
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / Donald Trump is half-right about NATO
NATO, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

February 13, 2024

Donald Trump is half-right about NATO

By Daniel DePetris

As tens of millions of Americans were huddled in front of their televisions to watch the Kansas City Chiefs snatch their second consecutive Super Bowl victory, Europeans across the pond—or at least European politicians responsible for the continent’s defense—were still coming to grips with what former president and GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump said in front of his supporters over the weekend.

During a rally on Saturday, Trump reminisced about when he told a European leader that the United States under his watch wouldn’t come to that country’s defense if it failed to meet NATO’s defense spending benchmarks. “One of the presidents of a big country stood up and said, ‘Well, sir, if we don’t pay and we’re attacked by Russia, will you protect us?’ I said, ‘You didn’t pay. You’re delinquent. … No, I would not protect you. In fact, I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want.’”

It didn’t take long for the reactions to come pouring in. The Europeans clearly didn’t appreciate the comments, even if the remarks weren’t necessarily surprising coming from a man who has a long record of viewing alliances in transactional terms. NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, who had a decent working relationship with Trump, issued a stern statement warning that “any suggestion that allies will not defend each other undermines all of our security, including that of the U.S., and puts American and European soldiers at increased risk.” Charles Michel, president of the European Council, called Trump’s remarks “reckless” without naming the former president.

It’s hard not to sympathize. It’s never a good idea for anybody to essentially invite an aggressor country such as Russia to treat the European continent as a personal playpen. Especially so when the person in charge of Russia, Vladimir Putin, has a habit of invading other countries (see Georgia in 2008, Ukraine in 2014 and Ukraine again in 2022).

Read at The Chicago Tribune

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine

America’s magical thinking on Ukraine and North Korea

Featuring Daniel Davis

November 3, 2025

In the mediaGrand strategy, Europe and Eurasia

U.S. cuts troops in Romania amid military posture ‘adjustments’

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

October 29, 2025

In the mediaGrand strategy, Europe and Eurasia

U.S. to draw down troops in Romania

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh and Daniel DePetris

October 29, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia

Europe’s persistence in supporting Ukraine is bearing fruit

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

October 24, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Russia’s oil giants get sanctioned by the US. Will it hurt the Kremlin’s war on Ukraine? (For now, no)

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

October 23, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

New oil sanctions will not stop Russia’s war machine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

October 23, 2025

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024
virtualNATO, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Reexamining the U.S. role in European security

May 3, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved