Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / Accepting ‘Ugly Terms’: Is This the Only Path to End the Ukraine War?
Ukraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

May 5, 2025

Accepting ‘Ugly Terms’: Is This the Only Path to End the Ukraine War?

By Daniel Davis

There is no pressure the West can bring to bear on Russia and no military support that can be given to Ukraine which can produce any definition of a positive outcome for Ukraine.

The longer the West travels down the road of seeking the diplomatic and militarily unattainable, the greater the final cost of the failure for the Ukrainian people. The blunt, painfully evident truth is the war was lost long ago.

Trump, who has been trying to bring the war to an end since his inauguration, has become “increasingly frustrated,” White House Spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said, that neither side seems willing to make the concessions necessary to reach a mutually agreeable settlement.

State Department Spokesperson Tammy Bruce said the U.S. has reached the point “where concrete proposals” need to be quickly agreed upon by both sides, or the U.S. will “step back as mediators in this process.” Many establishment figures in Washington, and a host of voices in Europe, are aghast at such talk, accusing Trump of blaming Zelensky for the war and for failing to “put pressure on Putin.”

Read at 19FortyFive

Author

Photo of Daniel Davis

Daniel
Davis

Senior Fellow & Military Expert

Defense Priorities

More on Eurasia

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Is Trump’s unified Republican front fracturing over Russia?

By Daniel DePetris

May 28, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, NATO, Russia, Ukraine

Putin would be foolish to attack Nato

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 27, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump’s flattery and bullying of Putin have been equally ineffective – and it’s obvious why

By Rajan Menon

May 27, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Europe and Eurasia, Russia

Reverse Kissinger? No, Double Kissinger

By Lyle Goldstein

May 25, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Europe and US slide further apart on Ukraine

By Daniel DePetris

May 23, 2025

In the mediaIran, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

New US-Iran Nuclear Talks as Tensions Rise

Featuring Daniel DePetris

May 22, 2025

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Past Virtual Event: A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved