Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Venezuela
    • China
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Asia / Trump’s cabinet may be ‘China hawk’ in name only, analysts say
Asia, China, Diplomacy, Grand strategy

November 21, 2024

Trump’s cabinet may be ‘China hawk’ in name only, analysts say

The prospect of a new foreign policy has attracted some relatively newer think tanks to Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s estate in Florida, where the transition team is working in full gear. Defense Priorities, a Washington group that advocates for restrained U.S. foreign policy, has deployed representatives to discuss policies with the Trump team and pitch its members as potential candidates for government jobs.

A member told Nikkei Asia the scale of engagement is incomparable to 2020, when the group merely submitted policy papers to the incoming Biden administration.

Reid Smith, vice president of foreign policy at the American billionaire Charles Koch-backed group Stand Together, which also advocates for restraint, said he was optimistic that Trump could move relations with China to “a more stable, modus vivendi” despite his appointments.

If Trump wants a deal with China, “his staff will work in furtherance of the principle’s policy-preference, as opposed to offering the sort of outright staff insubordination witnessed in the last administration,” Smith said.

Unlike in Trump’s first term, when national security adviser John Bolton and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo worked around the president to steer policy into certain directions, “the ideological determination is probably lower” with the hawks in Trump’s second administration, Smith said.

Read at Nikkei Asia

The Latest

op-edIran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East

The case for diplomacy with Iran

By Geoff LaMear

December 5, 2025

op-edMiddle East

The real problem with cozying up to the Saudis

By Benjamin Friedman and Rosemary Kelanic

December 5, 2025

op-edVenezuela, Americas

What are Trump’s motivations in Venezuela?

By Daniel DePetris

December 4, 2025

op-edAfrica, China, Counterterrorism

Instead of U.S. military ops in Nigeria, consider China’s playbook

By William Walldorf

December 4, 2025

op-edRussia, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Moscow talks expose the fantasy of a fair peace deal

By Jennifer Kavanagh

December 3, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Three months, two thousand meters: a snapshot of the War in Ukraine

By Gil Barndollar

December 3, 2025

Events on Asia

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved