Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / A Predictable Summit Still Offers Action Items for NATO
NATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

July 9, 2026

A Predictable Summit Still Offers Action Items for NATO

By Daniel DePetris

NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte and the rest of Washington’s European and Canadian allies closed out this year’s annual NATO summit in Ankara, Turkey, with a long exhale. From their perspective, the meeting wasn’t the disaster so many anticipated it to be. President Trump, for instance, didn’t announce a U.S. pullout from the alliance despite his frequent flirtations with doing so. He agreed to grant Ukraine a U.S. license so Kyiv can start producing its own Patriot missile interceptors, and he signed onto the communique reiterating that Article 5, the most important commandment in the NATO church, is alive and well.
Even so, the summitry was shaken apart by moments of Trumpian outrage. The U.S. president used his public remarks throughout the two-day event to gripe about how the United States was being treated unfairly by allies who should be champing at the bit to aid Washington any way they can. Spain, the perpetual defense laggard that refuses to abide by NATO’s own spending benchmarks, was singled out as a “terrible partner.” Trump also lit into Italy and the United Kingdom, yet again, for refusing to assist Washington’s war with Iran.
Despite those predictable grievances, Rutte’s attempts to keep Trump interested in the alliance have succeeded for the time being. But the optimal phrase here is “for the time being.” In the age of Trump, nothing is settled for long. Old disputes—like the status of Greenland—never go away, and power, not virtue signaling, is the name of the game. Incessant flattery will only get Washington’s NATO allies so far. If anyone was expecting this summit to produce permanent bonhomie between the United States and the rest of the transatlantic alliance, they were fooling themselves.

Read at National Review

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

Op-edUkraine, NATO, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

Ukraine is front of mind ahead of the NATO summit spectacle

By Daniel DePetris

July 7, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Trump’s reaction to NATO leaders’ flattery was entirely predictable

By Daniel DePetris

July 7, 2026

Q&ANATO, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia

Washington should retrench and let Europe rearm

By Thomas P. Cavanna

July 6, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Zelensky is in denial about Ukraine’s war hopes

By Jennifer Kavanagh

July 6, 2026

Op-edEurope and Eurasia, NATO

Misguided and Misunderstood: Trump’s Approach to U.S. Troops in Europe

By Benjamin Friedman

July 3, 2026

In the mediaGrand strategy, Europe and Eurasia, NATO

Revitalizing the Transatlantic Alliance: Principles for a Balanced NATO

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

June 30, 2026

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.