Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Europe and Eurasia / Misguided and Misunderstood: Trump’s Approach to U.S. Troops in Europe
Europe and Eurasia, NATO

July 3, 2026

Misguided and Misunderstood: Trump’s Approach to U.S. Troops in Europe

By Benjamin Friedman

For many observers, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s speech on the future of NATO, delivered in Brussels on June 18, 2026, constituted a perfect example of how the Trump administration is angrily abandoning the longstanding U.S. commitment to European security. The prevailing picture is that the administration is eager to shift the burden of Europe’s defense and is thus moving to withdraw U.S. forces from the continent, even though Europe is moving to do more militarily. Hegseth stated, “we’re doubling down on our effort to make NATO what it always was supposed to be, a balanced alliance with Europe in the lead for its own defense,” and announced that “to ensure that NATO is moving fast and irreversibly toward Europe leading,” the administration would conduct a “real review” of “America’s force posture and basing in Europe.”

For the legions of observers deeply critical of the Trump administration’s purported embrace of isolationism, the speech was yet another lamentable event. In particular, it has left them deeply concerned about the coming NATO summit in Ankara, as they fear the United States will take further steps down the isolationist road.

The Trump administration does indeed have the wrong approach in Europe, but not because it pushes to withdraw from Europe. Rather, the real issue is that the administration is not serious about disengaging from the continent. Yes, the administration is trimming around the edges of U.S. commitments, and it is doing so punitively. But the main thrust of Trump’s policy in Europe remains an extortive exchange: trading an extension of the U.S. presence for defense spending pledges that he can celebrate as landmark achievements, even though they are of dubious strategic value. If the past is any indication, odds are that the U.S. delegation will arrive in Ankara for the forthcoming summit proclaiming the need to radically rethink the alliance and threatening a vast array of force posture changes and other adjustments, but will ultimately do little to meaningfully alter the U.S. role in European security.

Read at War on the Rocks

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, NATO

An EU-style Article 4 mechanism would be insignificant

By Daniel DePetris

September 30, 2026

Op-edNATO, Europe and Eurasia

What really matters when Burnham meets Trump

By Daniel DePetris

September 22, 2026

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

As Walls Close In, Zelensky Lashes Out

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

September 16, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump Zelensky Trump denials can’t hide billions in U.S. weapons sent to Ukraine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

September 9, 2026

In the mediaGrand strategy, NATO

As The CIA Director Warns Putin Not to Take Advantage of U.S. Munitions Shortages, Europe Moves Away From Dependence on American Weapons and Security Guarantees

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

August 31, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, NATO, Russia, Ukraine

Russia does not want a war with Europe

By Jennifer Kavanagh

August 28, 2026

Events on Europe and Eurasia

See All Events
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia

What’s Next for U.S. Foreign Policy in 2026? Europe Edition

January 14, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

Defense Priorities Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization supported entirely by American individuals and foundations—no funding comes from the U.S. government or any foreign government. Donations are unlimited and deductible for Federal Income Tax purposes.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.