Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Western Hemisphere
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Syria / Withdraw U.S. troops from Syria and avoid needless risk
Syria, Middle East

October 20, 2021

Withdraw U.S. troops from Syria and avoid needless risk

By Daniel DePetris

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
October 20, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, there are reports that U.S. forces stationed at Al-Tanf in Syria have been targeted by a drone attack. Defense Priorities Fellow Daniel DePetris issued the following statement in response:

“If core U.S. security interests were at stake in Syria, maintaining a ground presence could perhaps be justified—but, two years after ISIS was denied its last scrap of territory, no vital U.S. interests remain there. The longer U.S. forces remain in Syria on an open-ended and ill-defined mission, the more likely an American will be pointlessly killed or seriously injured by a rocket or drone attack.

“Today, ISIS fighters are scattered, alienated from the population, facing multiple adversaries, and relegated to primitive hit-and-run attacks. Local militias are only capable of harming Americans because Washington has kept U.S. forces deployed in the region. The U.S. completed its mission long ago. The only responsible course is a full withdrawal, saving U.S. troops from needless risk.”

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Syria

op-edSyria, Middle East

The U.S. should pull the plug on its Syria deployment

By Daniel DePetris

February 1, 2026

op-edMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria

Trump’s Middle East policy is teetering on overextension

By William Walldorf

January 29, 2026

op-edSyria, Middle East

The U.S. is adapting its Syria strategy. Here’s why that’s a problem.

By Alexander Langlois

January 28, 2026

op-edSyria, Middle East

Syria’s Kurds lose out

By Daniel DePetris

January 20, 2026

op-edSyria, Middle East

What the recent clashes in Aleppo mean for Syria

By Alexander Langlois

January 16, 2026

op-edCounterterrorism, Syria

Attacks in Australia and Syria show how difficult it is to eliminate terrorism

By Daniel DePetris

December 23, 2025

Events on Syria

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved