Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / Using Ukraine for a proxy war with Russia isn’t pro-Ukraine
Ukraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

May 6, 2021

Using Ukraine for a proxy war with Russia isn’t pro-Ukraine

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
May 6, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, Secretary Blinken met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv, suggesting the U.S. could increase security assistance for Ukraine. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statements in response:

“Aid to Ukraine is not related to U.S. security. The U.S. has no strong interests in Ukraine and no pact that obligates us to help defend it and thus puts U.S. credibility on the line there. Ukraine is a victim of Russia, which attacked it in 2014, seizing Crimea, and threatens to attack again. But the fact that we sympathize with Ukraine does not establish that we should provide Kyiv with an endless stream of military aid. The question to ask is what end state Washington wants to use aid to produce.

“If the point is to fix the imbalance of power between Ukraine and Russia, the aid is futile. Ukraine has 209,000 active-duty military personnel to Russia’s 900,000, and a 1,200-mile land border with Russia to defend. Its defense spending in 2021 is projected to be $4.3 billion, less than a tenth of Russia’s, which also has more than ten times Ukraine’s GDP.

“We should ask whether we are encouraging Ukraine to adopt a security strategy where it becomes a western protectorate, rather than staying neutral between Russia and NATO. In other words, we may be preventing Ukraine from adopting the policies its geography demands and thus prolonging conflict there. Making Ukraine a proxy in fight with Russia we won’t sacrifice Americans for is no great favor.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Ukraine-Russia

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Ukraine‑Russia

Europe debates the bomb

By Daniel DePetris

February 19, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine and Russia are both suffering as the war enters its fifth year

By Daniel DePetris

February 10, 2026

Op-edGrand strategy, Iran, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia, US‑Israel‑Iran

What happens when we give Europe first dibs on U.S. missiles for war

By Jennifer Kavanagh

February 9, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Conceding Donetsk won’t end the war in Ukraine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

January 28, 2026

Op-edRussia, Ukraine‑Russia

Seizing empty Russian oil tanker doesn’t serve America’s interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh

January 8, 2026

In the mediaGrand strategy, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine‑Russia

Daniel Davis critiques the ‘coalition of the willing’ in Ukraine-Russia war: LBC

Featuring Daniel Davis

January 6, 2026

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.