Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Alliances / U.S. troop reduction incentivizes Germany to take more responsibility
Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Great power competition

July 29, 2020

U.S. troop reduction incentivizes Germany to take more responsibility

By Daniel Davis

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
July 29, 2020
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, the Associated Press reported that the U.S. will reduce its 34,500-strong troop contingent in Germany—returning 6,400 forces home and shifting another 5,600 to other European nations. Defense Priorities Senior Fellow Lt. Col. Daniel L. Davis, USA, Ret. issued the following statement in response:

“This drawdown is a welcome first step to a necessary and overdue reduction of U.S. forces on the continent. The U.S. force posture in Europe continues to reflect Cold War dynamics that no longer exist. As the U.S. grapples with crises at home and Asia grows in global importance, restructuring U.S. security arrangements in Europe can help conserve resources and encourage allies to take greater responsibility for their defense.

“Europe enjoys a high degree of safety and is largely wealthy and technologically advanced. Russia, whose power has declined substantially since its Soviet days, is mostly a threat to its smaller immediate neighbors.  Germany, the continent’s leading economy, is set to rebound rapidly from the current pandemic, and has long had the means to contribute more to continental security. Instead, it has invested in domestic priorities while the U.S. picks up the tab for its defense.

“Troops withdrawn from Germany should be returned to the U.S. rather than reshuffled among other allies. The era of great power competition demands that U.S. allies be capable partners, not security dependents. As long as the U.S. maintains a large military presence in Europe and continues to guard the continent’s periphery, NATO states have no incentive to grow their capabilities and meaningfully contribute to the alliance.”

Author

Photo of Daniel Davis

Daniel
Davis

Senior Fellow & Military Expert

Defense Priorities

More on Alliances

In the mediaNATO, Europe and Eurasia

NATO’s frontline countries jockey for U.S. troops after Trump’s Germany withdrawal

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

May 12, 2026

Op-edEurope and Eurasia, NATO

Europe’s French nuclear shield?

By Daniel DePetris

May 7, 2026

Op-edNATO, Europe and Eurasia

Trump’s right to take troops out of Germany. Now see where they go.

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 6, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Why Donald Trump Doesn’t Want European Strategic Autonomy

By Thomas P. Cavanna

May 5, 2026

In the mediaNATO, Europe and Eurasia

Trump’s threat to pull troops out of Germany crashes into reality

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

April 30, 2026

Op-edEurope and Eurasia, Iran, Middle East, NATO, US‑Israel‑Iran

Will King Charles’ visit help soften the animus between the U.S. and the UK?

By Daniel DePetris

April 28, 2026

Events on Alliances

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Alliances, Diplomacy, Israel, Military analysis

Assessing a formal U.S.-Saudi alliance

October 17, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.