Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Taiwan / U.S. forces in Taiwan—a massive risk, minuscule military benefit
Taiwan, Asia, China

October 7, 2021

U.S. forces in Taiwan—a massive risk, minuscule military benefit

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
October 7, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, The Wall Street Journal reported that U.S. Marines and special operations forces have been deployed in Taiwan and training forces there for at least a year. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“For a minuscule military benefit in training Taiwanese forces, the U.S. runs the risk of further poisoning relations with China and potentially even getting dragged into an avoidable war that could go nuclear.

“Nor are U.S. troops in Taiwan a tripwire that will deter China from attacking. If China is motivated and aggressive enough to risk attacking Taiwan, it is doubtful that they will be cautious enough see killing a few U.S. Marines as a reason not to. It’s more likely that the troops are an added provocation.

“Rather than keeping U.S. troops in Taiwan, the U.S. should push Taiwan to invest more in its self-defense capacity—especially radar and mobile anti-ship and anti-air missiles, which makes an amphibious attack on the island more costly. Taiwan recently announced new spending in this direction, which is good. But the more U.S. forces seem likely to defend Taiwan, the less urgency they will feel to address their problems internally and up their military spending to a level appropriate to the Chinese threat.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

In the mediaGrand strategy, Asia

‘Restrainers’ propose slashing U.S. troop numbers in South Korea, Okinawa

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Great power competition

What is Trump’s “new realism” in foreign policy?

By Lyle Goldstein

July 4, 2025

In the mediaChina, Asia, Taiwan

American bombs in Iran also reverberate in China and North Korea

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

July 4, 2025

op-edNATO, Alliances, Asia

Why America’s East Asian allies skipped the NATO summit

By Lyle Goldstein

July 2, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Iran, North Korea, Russia

There is no ‘axis of autocracy’

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

Events on Taiwan

See All Events
virtualAsia, China, Grand strategy, Taiwan

Past Virtual Event: Are semiconductors a reason to defend Taiwan?

November 17, 2022
virtualChina, Grand strategy, Taiwan

Past Virtual Event: Taiwan tensions and U.S.-China competition

August 25, 2022

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved