Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Russia / Standoffs between the U.S. and Russians in Syria show the need for a U.S. withdrawal
Russia, Middle East, Syria

February 6, 2020

Standoffs between the U.S. and Russians in Syria show the need for a U.S. withdrawal

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
February 6, 2020
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, The Wall Street Journal reported that standoffs between U.S. forces and Russians in Syria have been increasing over recent weeks. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“Standoffs between Russian contractors and U.S. forces are an unsurprising reminder of the need to get U.S. forces out of Syria. Though the risk of escalation to war with Russia is low, the massive consequences are worth cautiously avoiding, especially given that the 600 U.S. forces in Syria no longer serve any sensible purpose. And Russia is not the only rival power in Syria whose conflict with U.S. forces might escalate to war.

“Remember that in February 2018, U.S. special operations forces killed maybe 100 Russian mercenaries in an hours-long battle. U.S. Special Enjoy Jim Jeffrey later said minor clashes with Russians were a regular occurrence. The alarming suggestion that U.S. forces were occasionally shooting at a nuclear-armed rival elicited strangely little press or congressional attention.

“Meanwhile in Idlib province, Turkish forces—theoretically backed by the United States via NATO—are fighting Russian-backed Syrian forces, and both Russian and Turkish soldiers have reportedly been killed, though it is not clear by whom. The possibility of a U.S. clash with Iranian backed forces also lingers, creating a risk of escalation like what recently occurred in Iraq. Confrontation with Syrian government forces becomes likelier the longer U.S. forces stay.

“With ISIS’s caliphate gone and its remnants hunted by local powers, the United States has nothing to gain from staying in Syria. Sitting on oil wells just denies the Assad regime, which is regaining control of the country, a bit of revenue, without any greater purpose. Confrontations with Russia are a reminder that keeping U.S. forces in the middle of Syria’s chaotic environment is a needless risk.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Russia

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

A Flawed Formula for Peace in Ukraine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

April 7, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Europe and Eurasia, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Russia and Ukraine trade attacks as the Iran war pulls U.S. attention away

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

March 23, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

Russia Wins the War on Iran

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

March 14, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine‑Russia

Iran war has given Putin leverage over Trump

By Jennifer Kavanagh

March 12, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, US‑Israel‑Iran

Is Ukraine peace toast, now that the Middle East is on fire?

By Jennifer Kavanagh

March 9, 2026

Op-edNuclear weapons, Europe and Eurasia, Russia

Russia Is Offering An Informal Nuclear Deal. Washington Should Take It.

By John Grover

February 25, 2026

Events on Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.