Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Burden sharing / Sending more U.S. troops to Poland undermines European burden sharing
Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy, NATO

June 12, 2019

Sending more U.S. troops to Poland undermines European burden sharing

By Edward King

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
June 12, 2019
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—On Wednesday, at a press conference with Polish President Andrzej Duda, President Trump announced he will deploy up to 2,000 U.S. troops to Poland, in addition to the more than 4,000 already there. Defense Priorities President Edward King issued the following statement in response:

“Deploying additional U.S. troops to Poland undermines prudent efforts to force Europe to do more for its own defense. An additional 2,000 troops won’t improve Poland’s security—and certainly not America’s—but are sufficient to alarm Russia, possibly provoking further security competition in eastern Europe.

“Increasing the U.S. military footprint in Poland discourages the burden sharing President Trump and prior presidents have demanded of our NATO-Europe allies. Placing U.S. forces between them and Russia absolves western Europe’s wealthy, powerful nations of responsibility for the security of their eastern neighbors and their own continent at large.

“Most European NATO members are still a long way from their commitment to spend 2 percent of GDP on defense—and most will never reach that benchmark, let alone field modern military power to contribute to the alliance. Their lack of action is telling: NATO-Europe either believes the United States is bluffing when it demands they do more for their own security, or they do not perceive a serious Russian threat. Either way, adding to the U.S. garrison in Poland does not advance America’s aims.

“Committing additional forces to Europe leaves fewer resources to address higher strategic priorities here at home and arguably in Asia.”

Author

Photo of Edward King

Edward
King

Founder & President

Defense Priorities

More on Burden sharing

Q&ANATO, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia

Washington should retrench and let Europe rearm

By Thomas P. Cavanna

July 6, 2026

ExplainerNATO, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia

Let Europe rearm: Capitalize on NATO’s five percent pledge

By Thomas P. Cavanna

June 23, 2026

ExplainerBurden sharing, Basing and force posture, Europe and Eurasia, NATO

Stop bargaining with Europe, start leaving

By Benjamin Friedman and Moritz Graefrath

May 27, 2026

Op-edBurden sharing, Grand strategy

Analyzing Trump’s foreign policy and its international implications

By Benjamin Friedman

May 13, 2026

In the mediaNATO, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia

Why and How Europeans Must Prepare for U.S. Retrenchment

Featuring Justin Logan

April 28, 2026

Op-edGrand strategy, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, NATO

Pros and Cons in the National Security Strategy

By Daniel DePetris

December 16, 2025

Events on Burden sharing

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualGrand strategy, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, Global posture, Military analysis

National Defense Strategy: Underfunded or overstretched?

October 31, 2024
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.