Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Western Hemisphere
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / Resolving the Ukraine-Russia crisis requires diplomacy, not troop deployments
Ukraine‑Russia, Diplomacy, NATO, Russia, Ukraine

February 2, 2022

Resolving the Ukraine-Russia crisis requires diplomacy, not troop deployments

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
February 2, 2022
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, the U.S. announced it will deploy 3,000 U.S. troops to NATO allies in Europe. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“Deploying more troops to European allies’ territory is a symbolic act that won’t solve the Ukraine problem. Now there will be roughly 67,000 active duty troops in Europe instead of 65,000. Were these new troops a bargaining chip that could be traded for Russian concessions, they might have some value. But they seem instead to be permanent, an irritant for Russia designed to show resolve. In that sense they are essentially a distraction from the drama around Ukraine and diplomatic efforts to solve it.

“Rather than deploy troops, the U.S. should admit it won’t expand NATO to Ukraine or let NATO troops deploy there. Instead, U.S. leaders insist on risking Ukraine now for the principle that we might defend it later. Ending this absurd policy will do far more for Ukraine than stationing a few more troops in Europe.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Ukraine-Russia

op-edNATO, Alliances, Ukraine‑Russia

Europe debates the bomb

By Daniel DePetris

February 19, 2026

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine and Russia are both suffering as the war enters its fifth year

By Daniel DePetris

February 10, 2026

op-edGrand strategy, Iran, U.S.‑Iran, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

What happens when we give Europe first dibs on U.S. missiles for war

By Jennifer Kavanagh

February 9, 2026

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Conceding Donetsk won’t end the war in Ukraine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

January 28, 2026

op-edRussia, Ukraine‑Russia

Seizing empty Russian oil tanker doesn’t serve America’s interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh

January 8, 2026

In the mediaGrand strategy, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine‑Russia

Daniel Davis critiques the ‘coalition of the willing’ in Ukraine-Russia war: LBC

Featuring Daniel Davis

January 6, 2026

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved