Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Iran / Remove U.S. forces from Iran’s reach, especially amid maximum pressure and escalation
Iran, Middle East

January 3, 2020

Remove U.S. forces from Iran’s reach, especially amid maximum pressure and escalation

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
January 3, 2020
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, media outlets reported the Trump administration will send 3,500 additional U.S. troops to the Middle East following military strikes that killed Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“The U.S. drone strike that killed IRGC commander Qassem Soleimani and five or six of his associates should be judged by its consequences for U.S. security interests. Saying the strike was morally justified does not establish its strategic wisdom. U.S. foreign policy should advance U.S. interests, not dispense global justice by punishing the wicked.

“Removing U.S. forces and personnel from Iran’s reach is paramount. Remember, the strike also killed Mahdi al-Muhandis, deputy commander of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces. His death especially seems certain to enrage the various well-armed Shiite militias in Iraq, who fought on the U.S. side against ISIS. The militias include as many as 500,000 fighters by some counts, or roughly 100 times the number of U.S. forces stationed in Iraq. They pose a formidable threat to nearby U.S. forces.

“While Soleimani’s death means he can no longer engage in hostile actions against U.S. interests—a certain good—Iran’s threat does not hinge on any one person. Claims that Soleimani was planning “imminent” attacks when killed could be true, but his killing is likely to increase attacks on U.S. forces. And there are less risky ways to thwart such attacks while avoiding needless escalation that jeopardizes more U.S. soldiers’ lives.

“As the events of the last two weeks underline, the smattering of U.S. forces in the region are insufficient to accomplish any vital objective but are plentiful enough to pull the United States into needless trouble. Rather than send 3,500 more U.S. troops to the Middle East, where they will join in vulnerability with thousands of others, the United States should remove its forces from Iraq and draw down from the broader region.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edIran, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

Maximalism will doom diplomacy with Iran

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 8, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Middle East

As Donald Trump prepares for Middle East visit, his efforts there aren’t inspiring

By Daniel DePetris

May 6, 2025

Press ReleaseHouthis, Air power, Middle East, Military analysis, Yemen

Ending strikes on Yemen: Good news if it sticks

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 6, 2025

op-edIran, Middle East

Trump needs his team on the same Iran page

By Daniel DePetris

May 5, 2025

op-edYemen, Air power, Houthis, Iran, Middle East

In Yemen, Trump risks falling into an ‘airpower trap’ that has drawn past US presidents into costly wars

By William Walldorf

May 5, 2025

ExplainerMiddle East, China, Europe and Eurasia

China can’t dominate the Middle East

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 5, 2025

Events on Iran

See All Events
virtualHouthis, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Yemen

Past Virtual Event: Houthi conundrum: defend, degrade, or defer

March 28, 2024
virtualGrand strategy, Iran, Middle East, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024
in-personGrand strategy, Iran, North Korea, Nuclear weapons

Past In-Person Event: Managing nuclear proliferation crises

October 30, 2017

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved