Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Afghanistan / Friday’s reduction to 2,500 troops in Afghanistan is a positive step
Afghanistan, Counterterrorism

January 14, 2021

Friday’s reduction to 2,500 troops in Afghanistan is a positive step

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
January 14, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Tomorrow (January 15) is the deadline for the U.S. to drawdown its troop presence in Afghanistan to 2,500, as stipulated by the withdrawal deal signed between the Taliban and Washington last February. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“The on-time reduction of U.S. forces in Afghanistan to 2,500 is a rare bit of good news in recent U.S. foreign policy. That’s not because drawdown represents a victory, but because it’s an overdue recognition of failure. The war in Afghanistan, while initially successful in attacking Al-Qaeda and punishing the Taliban for hosting them, lasted at least 15 years too long.

“The drawdown should continue under the Biden administration, and full exit completed by May, as per the U.S.-Taliban agreement. Calls to keep troops there, perhaps relabeled as a counterterrorism force, would violate the deal and likely pull U.S. forces back into the civil war. Nor is their presence likely to make a Taliban peace deal with the Afghan government much more likely. Sadly, peace is unlikely—no matter what the U.S. does.

“There is no immaculate withdrawal option. But U.S. counterterrorism aims in Afghanistan can be met by a combination of intelligence, long-range strike capability, and threats to again punish Taliban leaders if they let Al-Qaeda terrorists operate.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edNATO, Alliances, Asia

Why America’s East Asian allies skipped the NATO summit

By Lyle Goldstein

July 2, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Iran, North Korea, Russia

There is no ‘axis of autocracy’

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Iran, Middle East, Russia

How not to do multipolarity

By Anthony Constantini

June 28, 2025

op-edChina, Asia, Israel‑Iran

Why China’s sitting on the Iran war sidelines

By Lyle Goldstein

June 25, 2025

In the mediaChina, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

What does China’s military gain from operating 2 aircraft carriers in second island chain?

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

June 13, 2025

op-edNorth Korea, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

Trump’s North Korea conundrum

By Daniel DePetris

June 12, 2025

Events on Afghanistan

See All Events
virtualAfghanistan, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: One year later: assessing the Afghanistan withdrawal

August 30, 2022
in-personCounterterrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East, Syria

Past In-Person Event: Ground truth about ground wars

November 5, 2019

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved