Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Venezuela
    • China
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Afghanistan / Drawing down 4,000 U.S. troops from Afghanistan is progress, but not enough
Afghanistan

December 15, 2019

Drawing down 4,000 U.S. troops from Afghanistan is progress, but not enough

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
December 15, 2019
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—On Saturday, NBC News reported President Trump intends to draw down 4,000 U.S. troops from Afghanistan. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statements in response:

“Removing 4,000 U.S. troops from Afghanistan would be an overdue down payment on full withdrawal. Let’s see if it really happens. As Syria demonstrated, the Trump administration does not always carry out its reported plans to withdraw forces from combat zones.

“The Afghanistan War is a bleeding wound that should end. Withdrawal should not await a deal with a Taliban or anything else. As the ‘Afghanistan Papers’ published in The Washington Post underscored, the nation-building effort in Afghanistan is an abject failure. The continued loss of U.S. lives and taxpayer dollars is indefensible.

“The United States long ago achieved its initial goals in Afghanistan of destroying Al-Qaeda as a functional threat and punishing the Taliban for hosting them. Since then, Washington has pursued a futile nation-building effort that would do little for U.S. security even if it succeeded, which it cannot, at least at an acceptable cost.

“Defending against anti-U.S. terror threats does not require endless war. The U.S. capability to monitor and eliminate direct threats keeps America safe, regardless of what happens in Afghanistan’s civil war. The Taliban leadership will not provide terrorists safe haven because it has been deterred, not because of any agreement. U.S. leaders should make it clear force will be always used against the Taliban should they again tolerate a presence of anti-U.S. terrorists there.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Afghanistan

In the mediaAfghanistan, Middle East

Donald Trump Wants U.S. Military Base Back in Afghanistan

Featuring Daniel DePetris

September 18, 2025

op-edAfghanistan, Counterterrorism, Middle East

Turns out leaving Afghanistan did not unleash terror on U.S. or region

By Rosemary Kelanic

August 28, 2025

op-edAfghanistan, China, Middle East, Russia

Washington shouldn’t fear Russia and China seeking influence in Afghanistan

By Lyle Goldstein

August 9, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Afghanistan, Grand strategy, Syria

Trump can transform Middle East policy

By Daniel DePetris

February 7, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Afghanistan, China, China‑Taiwan, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Taiwan, Ukraine‑Russia

Biden’s final foreign policy speech: an exercise in self-promotion

By Christopher McCallion

January 13, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Afghanistan, Americas, Europe and Eurasia, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

As Biden exits, he grapples with his foreign policy legacy

By Daniel DePetris

January 9, 2025

Events on Afghanistan

See All Events
virtualAfghanistan, Middle East

One year later: assessing the Afghanistan withdrawal

August 30, 2022
in-personCounterterrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East, Syria

Ground truth about ground wars

November 5, 2019

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved