Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / North Korea / Deterrence has worked against North Korea and will continue to work
North Korea, Asia

March 24, 2022

Deterrence has worked against North Korea and will continue to work

By Lyle Goldstein

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
March 24, 2022
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, North Korea tested an intercontinental ballistic missile, Pyongyang’s most significant missile test in years. Defense Priorities Director of Asia Engagement Lyle Goldstein issued the following statement in response:

“This ICBM test, the first since 2017, demonstrates new progress in North Korea’s missile program. That’s bad news, but the U.S. position in Northeast Asia remains strong. Washington should react calmly to this foreseeable provocation. The U.S. retains overwhelming nuclear and conventional military superiority with respect to North Korea. Deterrence has worked against North Korea for seven decades and will continue to work. If North Korea dared to launch an ICBM at the U.S., North Korea would be destroyed. Pyongyang is extremely unlikely to commit national suicide in this way.

“While there is no cause for panic, there is a reason to reform the U.S. approach to the issue. To avoid continued instability, Washington needs to alter its approach to the Korean Peninsula. First, it should reengage with North Korea. Continuing talks with Pyongyang are an imperative in the nuclear age. Second, the U.S. should recognize that denuclearizing North Korea is unrealistic, but other types of arms control arrangement could be within reach, especially when paired with sanctions relief. Third, Washington will need to coordinate carefully with Seoul, and do so with the knowledge that South Korea has vast superiority over North Korea in most metrics of power. Finally, the developing ‘New Cold War’ with China, and now with Russia, are not conducive to a peace on the Korean Peninsula. These tensions should be mitigated, because both Beijing and Moscow have important roles in the security of Northeast Asia.”

Author

Photo of Lyle Goldstein

Lyle
Goldstein

Director, Asia Program

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edNATO, Alliances, Asia

Why America’s East Asian allies skipped the NATO summit

By Lyle Goldstein

July 2, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Iran, North Korea, Russia

There is no ‘axis of autocracy’

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Iran, Middle East, Russia

How not to do multipolarity

By Anthony Constantini

June 28, 2025

op-edChina, Asia, Israel‑Iran

Why China’s sitting on the Iran war sidelines

By Lyle Goldstein

June 25, 2025

In the mediaChina, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

What does China’s military gain from operating 2 aircraft carriers in second island chain?

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

June 13, 2025

op-edNorth Korea, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

Trump’s North Korea conundrum

By Daniel DePetris

June 12, 2025

Events on North Korea

See All Events
in-personNorth Korea, Asia, Deterrence, Diplomacy, Nuclear weapons

Past In-Person Event: Ending the North Korea standoff

March 5, 2018
in-personGrand strategy, Iran, North Korea, Nuclear weapons

Past In-Person Event: Managing nuclear proliferation crises

October 30, 2017

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved