Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Western Hemisphere
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine / Be honest with Ukraine—Additional U.S. aid is not guaranteed
Ukraine, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine‑Russia

December 12, 2023

Be honest with Ukraine—Additional U.S. aid is not guaranteed

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
December 12, 2023
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is meeting with President Joe Biden at the White House. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“If the United States is pressing a resistant Ukraine to adopt a more defensive strategy, as reported, that is good news. The war in Ukraine has shown the advantages of defensive warfare and the narrow odds of Ukraine reclaiming all its territory by force. That is evidently unrealistic, and the United States is irresponsible in allowing Ukrainian leaders to linger in the hope of doing so. It is morally outrageous to keep encouraging Ukrainians, with words and aid, to die for objectives we deem unreachable.

“President Biden and his administration’s officials should also stop assuring Ukraine that U.S. aid will be forthcoming. Such a decision is up to Congress, and the Biden administration cannot guarantee they will still be in power in 2025. They should use that immutable uncertainty to tell Ukraine that they cannot count on continued aid, which is one more reason to shift to a defensive posture and advance negotiations with Russia. Even an armistice agreement could take years.

“Remember that U.S. interests and Ukrainian interests are not the same. Washington’s desire to keep Russia from menacing NATO Europe and to demonstrate the futility of conquest is essentially achieved, thanks to Ukraine’s sacrifice. However much we might root for Ukraine to take back all its land, U.S. security does not need that.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Ukraine

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine and Russia are both suffering as the war enters its fifth year

By Daniel DePetris

February 10, 2026

op-edGrand strategy, Iran, U.S.‑Iran, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

What happens when we give Europe first dibs on U.S. missiles for war

By Jennifer Kavanagh

February 9, 2026

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Conceding Donetsk won’t end the war in Ukraine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

January 28, 2026

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Zelensky-Trump meeting produced no winners

By Jennifer Kavanagh

December 29, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, NATO, Russia, Ukraine

Trump’s security promise to Ukraine may be more dangerous than it looks

By Jennifer Kavanagh

December 26, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s own pragmatism demands ‘armed un-alignment’

By Jennifer Kavanagh

December 22, 2025

Events on Ukraine

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved