Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Middle East / As Middle East tensions rise, U.S. forces remain vulnerable
Middle East, Iraq, Israel, Syria

October 19, 2023

As Middle East tensions rise, U.S. forces remain vulnerable

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
October 19, 2023
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—This evening, President Joe Biden is scheduled to deliver a speech discussing U.S. support for Israel in their war with Hamas. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“Recent attacks on U.S. forces in the Middle East should underline the urgency of removing troops from the region. The attacks—including drones targeting U.S. bases in Syria and Iraq, plus a U.S. naval vessel’s interception of missiles off Yemen’s coast—came from militias tied in some way to Iran. These incidents may be the result of increased tensions resulting from the war between Hamas and Israel.

“The United States has a duty to defend its forces. That includes asking what they are accomplishing and protecting them from needless danger. The war on ISIS was won long ago, and their scattered remnants are hunted by all regional powers. U.S. forces in Syria and Iraq thus have little to achieve, but are vulnerable to attack and are sources of potential escalation with Syria’s government, Iran, Russia, and even Turkey. The presence of U.S. troops in Syria, in other words, runs a major risk for no clear benefit to Americans.

“The terrible case for leaving these troops in place only got worse with the war in Israel. These forces are vulnerable to attacks from Shi’ite militias and other hostiles potentially motivated to attack by trouble starting in Israel. Even if U.S. forces go unharmed, their vulnerability is a source of coercive leverage for these groups and their Iranian sponsors. Removing U.S. forces from Syria and Iraq is not capitulation to any U.S. adversary, but a way to deny them an advantage. U.S. forces in the area now run a great risk of being a pathway to a war with Iran, rather than being a means to deter one.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

LTE: Attacks on Iran slow nuclear programme yet solve nothing

By Daniel DePetris

July 15, 2025

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

Why the Israel-Iran ceasefire feels like a strategic failure

By Alexander Langlois

July 8, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Israel‑Iran, Middle East

Don’t bet on a Gaza ceasefire

July 3, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

What lessons are foreign leaders taking from Donald Trump’s Iran bombing?

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Iran, North Korea, Russia

There is no ‘axis of autocracy’

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

Events on Middle East

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved