Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Afghanistan / A draw down to Obama-era troop levels in Afghanistan is not enough
Afghanistan, Counterterrorism

August 29, 2019

A draw down to Obama-era troop levels in Afghanistan is not enough

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
August 29, 2019
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—On Thursday, President Trump announced his intention to draw down U.S. force levels in Afghanistan from 14,000 to 8,600 and stated that “you have to keep a presence.” Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“President Trump’s decision to leave 8,600 soldiers in Afghanistan is a return to the troop levels of the Obama administration and a reversal of his intention to end Washington’s nearly 18-year war there. Anything short of full withdrawal is a mistake.

“The counterterrorism mission that took U.S. forces to Afghanistan in the first place—to decimate Al-Qaeda and punish the Taliban for harboring those terrorists—was long ago accomplished. Successful counterterrorism there does not require a permanent ground presence, let alone 8,600 troops. That force level only perpetuates the failed nation-building mission.

“U.S. security is protected by its global military capabilities to monitor and eliminate anti-U.S. terror threats, intelligence cooperation, and homeland security. Policing Afghanistan is a separate mission entirely.

“The president was right when he said great nations don’t fight endless wars—President Trump should finally end this one.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edNATO, Alliances, Asia

Why America’s East Asian allies skipped the NATO summit

By Lyle Goldstein

July 2, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Iran, North Korea, Russia

There is no ‘axis of autocracy’

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Iran, Middle East, Russia

How not to do multipolarity

By Anthony Constantini

June 28, 2025

op-edChina, Asia, Israel‑Iran

Why China’s sitting on the Iran war sidelines

By Lyle Goldstein

June 25, 2025

In the mediaChina, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

What does China’s military gain from operating 2 aircraft carriers in second island chain?

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

June 13, 2025

op-edNorth Korea, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

Trump’s North Korea conundrum

By Daniel DePetris

June 12, 2025

Events on Afghanistan

See All Events
virtualAfghanistan, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: One year later: assessing the Afghanistan withdrawal

August 30, 2022
in-personCounterterrorism, Afghanistan, Iraq, Middle East, Syria

Past In-Person Event: Ground truth about ground wars

November 5, 2019

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved