Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / China / Xi Jinping just buried the age of American hegemony
China, Asia

October 30, 2025

Xi Jinping just buried the age of American hegemony

By Daniel DePetris

The core goal of the meeting between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping was clear enough: bring the temperature down and strike some agreements that would stabilise one of the world’s most important bilateral relationships. On this score, the summit can be declared a success. Trump was beaming after the hours-long discussions and characteristically sought to display the results as the beginning of a new era. “Zero, to 10, with 10 being the best, I’d say the meeting was a 12,” he told reporters on Air Force One. “A lot of decisions were made… and we’ve come to a conclusion on very many important points.”

In and of itself, this is significant. Sure, Trump and Xi didn’t resolve all of the issues that have caused such acrimony in the U.S.-China relationship, but nobody with their head screwed on correctly thought that was ever going to happen. It wasn’t so long ago that Washington and Beijing were slapping each other with tariffs so severe that they practically halted bilateral trade. And it was only weeks ago that Trump, upset about China’s heavy restrictions on the export of rare earth elements, threatened to impose an extra 100 per cent tariff by Nov 1 if the Chinese didn’t reverse course.

Well, they have reversed course—at least for the time being. Some of the rare earth export controls will now be suspended for a year. The Chinese will also import U.S. soybeans again, providing American farmers with financial relief. In return, Trump has agreed to half the tariffs he instituted on China on the fentanyl issue, purportedly in return for greater Chinese cooperation in staunching the flow of chemical precursors. In addition, the U.S. will postpone an investigation that could have increased fees for Chinese ships docking in American ports. China will do the same.

In other words, you can call this entire arrangement a truce in a trade war that is still technically in effect. The outstanding, systemic problems—China’s state-supported industrial policy; the dumping of cheap Chinese goods abroad; U.S. semiconductor export controls; Taiwan—are still lurking in the wings. If you were a gambler, the smart money would be on this cooling-off period eventually evaporating into another round of rancour as the same old issues rise again to the forefront.

Read at Telegraph

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

In the mediaChina‑Taiwan, Asia, China

U.S. spent roughly $3.4 trillion in military competition with China between 2012 and 2024, Watson study estimates

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh, Benjamin Friedman, and Lyle Goldstein

March 10, 2026

In the mediaChina, Asia, China‑Taiwan, Taiwan

Stability comes first: Chinese defence chief signals Beijing’s strategic caution

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

March 10, 2026

Op-edChina‑Taiwan, Asia, China

Trump-Xi Taiwan talks could defuse the tinderbox

By Thomas P. Cavanna

March 6, 2026

Op-edTaiwan, Asia, China‑Taiwan

Taiwan’s Defense Budget Dilemma

By Lyle Goldstein

March 2, 2026

Op-edAsia

U.S. missile deliveries to Philippines are pointless and escalatory

By Thomas P. Cavanna

February 27, 2026

In the mediaChina‑Taiwan, Asia, China

U.S. arms sale to Taiwan clashes with Trump’s desire to strike trade deal with China

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

February 22, 2026

Events on China

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.