Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Venezuela
    • China
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / Will Trump’s Zelensky spat undermine the realist cause?
Ukraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

February 20, 2025

Will Trump’s Zelensky spat undermine the realist cause?

By Christopher McCallion

The Trump administration has made a startling turn in the past few weeks on its foreign policy, particularly on Russia, Ukraine and Europe. American officials met with their Russian counterparts in Riyadh to begin talks toward a settlement of the war in Ukraine while signalling a willingness to repair relations with Moscow in the future. Trump, meanwhile, blamed Ukraine for starting the war and went out of his way to insult President Volodymyr Zelensky as a “dictator” and, perhaps worse, a “moderately successful comedian”.

This is fairly galling given that it was in the United States’ power to avoid the war in the first place by retracting its pledge to bring Ukraine into Nato. Instead, Washington opted to use Kyiv as a cat’s paw to bleed Russia, and refused to push for a settlement earlier, which would have saved hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian and Russian lives. The first Trump administration itself set Russia and the West on a collision course by sending weapons to Ukraine after the Obama administration refused, and by leaving the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty in 2019.

What is frustrating about the recent actions of the Trump administration is that, from a realist perspective, the initial moves it has made have been promising. Unfortunately, all these events have been complicated—or even contradicted—by the President’s crude and incoherent approach, which unnecessarily threatens to sour America’s long-term relations with Europe.

Read at UnHerd

Author

Photo of Chris McCallion

Christopher
McCallion

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia

Europe’s persistence in supporting Ukraine is bearing fruit

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

October 24, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Russia’s oil giants get sanctioned by the US. Will it hurt the Kremlin’s war on Ukraine? (For now, no)

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

October 23, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

New oil sanctions will not stop Russia’s war machine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

October 23, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, NATO, Russia, Ukraine

No cause for alarm: The case for a measured response to Russian air incursions

By Jennifer Kavanagh

October 20, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

U.S. Tomahawk refusal protects Ukraine from false hope

By Jennifer Kavanagh

October 19, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

‘Appeasement over strength’—Trump’s ‘make a deal’ push leaves Zelensky empty-handed on key weapons

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

October 18, 2025

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved