Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / Why Trump should support a more autonomous Europe
NATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

April 30, 2025

Why Trump should support a more autonomous Europe

By Violet Collins

The transatlantic partnership is in perilous waters, but it doesn’t have to be. The Trump administration has been clear that it has no interest in maintaining America’s preeminent role in European defence, picking up where his first term left off in chastising European leaders for their free-riding off America’s largesse.

America’s lagging interest in the Ukraine war, increased prioritisation of threats elsewhere, and growing tension between Washington and Brussels have exposed the neglected truth of a divergence in European and American security interests. While taking a brash approach towards a relationship that once formed a cornerstone of America’s foreign policy may cost the U.S. some international goodwill, it is due time to reevaluate the transatlantic partnership, wind-down American troop deployments and defence provisions, and move towards a transatlantic alliance that is no longer characterised by wealthy and capable European countries depending on American security guarantees.

The Trump administration should explicitly and broadly support the EU’s recent push towards strategic autonomy. Opposing EU moves to ensure Europe’s own security capabilities will only serve to postpone the withdrawal of U.S. defence resources and prolong American defence contributions and entrenchment. Overbearing American involvement in EU security discussions moving forward would be counterintuitive to weaning European dependence. Further, broad approval of the EU strategic autonomy agenda is the best option to pursue a more sustainable alliance going forward, one that is rooted in each party taking primary responsibility for its own defence, and cooperating in areas where priorities overlap.

https://thecritic.co.uk/why-trump-should-support-a-more-autonomous-europe/

Author

Violet
Collins

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, NATO

An EU-style Article 4 mechanism would be insignificant

By Daniel DePetris

September 30, 2026

Op-edNATO, Europe and Eurasia

What really matters when Burnham meets Trump

By Daniel DePetris

September 22, 2026

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

As Walls Close In, Zelensky Lashes Out

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

September 16, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump Zelensky Trump denials can’t hide billions in U.S. weapons sent to Ukraine

By Jennifer Kavanagh

September 9, 2026

In the mediaGrand strategy, NATO

As The CIA Director Warns Putin Not to Take Advantage of U.S. Munitions Shortages, Europe Moves Away From Dependence on American Weapons and Security Guarantees

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

August 31, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, NATO, Russia, Ukraine

Russia does not want a war with Europe

By Jennifer Kavanagh

August 28, 2026

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

Defense Priorities Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization supported entirely by American individuals and foundations—no funding comes from the U.S. government or any foreign government. Donations are unlimited and deductible for Federal Income Tax purposes.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.