Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / Why Trump should support a more autonomous Europe
NATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

April 30, 2025

Why Trump should support a more autonomous Europe

By Violet Collins

The transatlantic partnership is in perilous waters, but it doesn’t have to be. The Trump administration has been clear that it has no interest in maintaining America’s preeminent role in European defence, picking up where his first term left off in chastising European leaders for their free-riding off America’s largesse.

America’s lagging interest in the Ukraine war, increased prioritisation of threats elsewhere, and growing tension between Washington and Brussels have exposed the neglected truth of a divergence in European and American security interests. While taking a brash approach towards a relationship that once formed a cornerstone of America’s foreign policy may cost the U.S. some international goodwill, it is due time to reevaluate the transatlantic partnership, wind-down American troop deployments and defence provisions, and move towards a transatlantic alliance that is no longer characterised by wealthy and capable European countries depending on American security guarantees.

The Trump administration should explicitly and broadly support the EU’s recent push towards strategic autonomy. Opposing EU moves to ensure Europe’s own security capabilities will only serve to postpone the withdrawal of U.S. defence resources and prolong American defence contributions and entrenchment. Overbearing American involvement in EU security discussions moving forward would be counterintuitive to weaning European dependence. Further, broad approval of the EU strategic autonomy agenda is the best option to pursue a more sustainable alliance going forward, one that is rooted in each party taking primary responsibility for its own defence, and cooperating in areas where priorities overlap.

https://thecritic.co.uk/why-trump-should-support-a-more-autonomous-europe/

Author

Violet
Collins

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Zelensky’s ‘Freya’ missile defense scheme could backfire. Here’s why.

By Jennifer Kavanagh

July 26, 2026

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

U.S. to make Kyiv’s Magura sea drones for the first time

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 23, 2026

Op-edEurope and Eurasia

New prime minister assumes the reins as Britain struggles

By Daniel DePetris

July 21, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Bring the Troops Home, Mr. President

By Anthony Constantini

July 16, 2026

In the mediaGrand strategy, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Quiet U.S. pullback in Eastern Europe sparks wider allied worries

July 16, 2026

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Daniel Davis discusses Russian strikes into the Black Sea on NBC News

Featuring Daniel Davis

July 14, 2026

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.