Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / Why isn’t Biden being straight with Zelensky?
Ukraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine

December 13, 2023

Why isn’t Biden being straight with Zelensky?

By Daniel DePetris

Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky’s visit to Washington a year ago was a love-fest, characterised by standing ovations from American politicians, lavish praise from president Biden and a commitment to keep the aid flowing. His visit this week, however, occurred in a much different atmosphere.

The politics of Ukraine aid have changed, with a growing number of Republican lawmakers wondering whether sending more taxpayer dollars to underwrite a stalemate is a wise course of action. While Ukraine’s cause has received a better hearing in the senate, Mitch McConnell, the minority leader, is intent on using the Biden administration’s $106 billion (£85 billion) national security supplemental request (more than half of which is earmarked for Ukraine) to press for tougher immigration laws. The frontline in Ukraine has barely moved in places over the last year—or, where it has moved, the advancements have been so marginal as to be practically meaningless in the grand scheme of things.

Zelensky understood he had a steep hill to climb. His two days in the U.S. capital consisted of a dizzying number of meetings. On 11 December, he delivered a speech to the National Defense university essentially making his case that Ukraine was fighting for all the world’s democracies. U.S. lawmakers, Zelensky argued, are only helping Russian president Vladimir Putin by dillydallying. ‘If there’s anyone inspired by unresolved issues on Capitol Hill,’ the Ukrainian president remarked, ‘it’s just Putin and his sick clique.’ It was an interesting public relations strategy, akin to shaming the very legislators that have already doled out more than $100 billion (£80 billion) in U.S. taxpayer assistance for Kyiv’s war effort.

Read at The Spectator

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

op-edNATO, Europe and Eurasia

Trump has a new European target in his crosshairs

By Daniel DePetris

October 17, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, NATO, Russia, Ukraine

President Donald Trump’s Ukraine pivot is an opportunity for Europe to step up

By Christopher McCallion

October 16, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Putin was never going to bend to Trump so easily

By Daniel DePetris

October 16, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s Maximalist Aims Remain Unattainable

By Geoff LaMear

October 11, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

David Petraeus’s Ukraine plan is a blueprint for failure

By Jennifer Kavanagh

October 1, 2025

op-edRussia, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Russia likely laughing off Trump’s ‘open door’ to Tomahawks

By Jennifer Kavanagh

September 30, 2025

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved