Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • Israel-Iran
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Alliances / Who will wield all those shiny new weapons?
Alliances, NATO, Ukraine‑Russia

September 3, 2025

Who will wield all those shiny new weapons?

By Gil Barndollar

After many decades of indecision and foot dragging, U.S. allies are finally rearming. At NATO’s annual summit in June, the bloc’s members committed to spending at least 5 percent of their GDP on defense and related infrastructure. East Asian countries are belatedly building warships and missiles to counter a stronger, more assertive China. But even as funding rises, factories retool, and arms production ramps up, one question remains unanswered: Who will wield all these new weapons?

NATO states have not solved the fundamental problem of who will fight. One of the key lessons of the Russia-Ukraine war is about numbers. The era of limited counterinsurgency operations and quick precision warfare is over. As more than half a million soldiers face one another across a 1,000-mile front, we have had to relearn an old principle of war: Mass matters. And ultimately, that mass still rests on manpower.

Read at Foreign Policy

Author

Photo of Gil Barndollar

Gil
Barndollar

Non-Resident Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Is the West fooling itself on Ukraine security guarantees?

By Daniel DePetris

September 3, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

The problem with peacekeepers

By Anthony Constantini

September 2, 2025

op-edNATO, Europe and Eurasia

An empty U.S.-NATO arms deal

By Violet Collins

August 28, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Why Putin is winning

By Jennifer Kavanagh

August 27, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

If Ukraine wants security guarantees, it should get them from Europe

By Dan Caldwell

August 26, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

What do ‘security guarantees’ mean for Ukraine?

By Daniel DePetris

August 22, 2025

Events on Alliances

See All Events
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Alliances, Diplomacy, Israel, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Assessing a formal U.S.-Saudi alliance

October 17, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Past Virtual Event: A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved