Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / What will Trump do if the Ukraine peace talks fail?
Ukraine‑Russia, Diplomacy, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

April 18, 2025

What will Trump do if the Ukraine peace talks fail?

By Daniel DePetris

With the war in Ukraine now in its fourth year, Trump administration officials, including Donald Trump himself, have spent the last month dialing their Ukrainian colleagues, jetting to foreign capitals to meet with Ukrainian and Russian officials, and huddling with European ministers in an attempt to bring the conflict to a conclusion. The latest meeting happened this week, when U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Steve Witkoff, Trump’s special envoy, traveled to Paris for an all-hands session.

Trump, however, doesn’t have much to show for his efforts. U.S. officials continue to put on a brave face and insist that Trump—and only Trump—has the knowledge, skill-set and experience to negotiate an end to Europe’s deadliest war in 80 years. But a confluence of factors outside of his control—namely the actions of the combatants themselves—runs the high risk of killing off Washington’s diplomatic gamble before it has a chance to succeed. Even Trump, who once boastfully declared he could solve the war in 24 hours, is getting increasingly impatient with the entire enterprise.

It’s not like the Trump administration hasn’t notched any wins on the board. Given the intractability of the warring parties, the fact that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was once impervious to negotiations with a tyrant like Vladimir Putin and the sheer hatred accumulated after three years of intense warfare, just getting Ukrainian and Russian officials into a diplomatic process can be labeled progress.

Yet the process hasn’t produced anything but dashed hopes. The March 11 joint statement announcing Kyiv’s support for an unconditional 30-day ceasefire was quickly rejected by Putin, who introduced a slew of questions about who would enforce it, how violators would be punished and when the core issues would be addressed.

Read at Spectator

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Eurasia

op-edRussia, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Trump’s tough talk won’t end war in Ukraine

By Daniel DePetris

July 26, 2025

ExplainerNATO, China, Russia

Keep NATO focused on Europe, not China

By Thomas P. Cavanna

July 24, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

How Trump’s 50-day deadline threat against Putin will backfire

By Jennifer Kavanagh

July 15, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Vladimir Putin’s conduct causes Donald Trump to have a change of heart on Ukraine

By Daniel DePetris

July 15, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Military analysis

Will Trump’s shift on arming Ukraine help end Russia’s invasion? Experts weigh in

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 15, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

What Trump’s Ukraine aid pause says about America’s broken foreign policy

By Daniel DePetris

July 14, 2025

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Past Virtual Event: A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved