Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / What will Trump do if the Ukraine peace talks fail?
Ukraine‑Russia, Diplomacy, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

April 18, 2025

What will Trump do if the Ukraine peace talks fail?

By Daniel DePetris

With the war in Ukraine now in its fourth year, Trump administration officials, including Donald Trump himself, have spent the last month dialling their Ukrainian colleagues, jetting to foreign capitals to meet with Ukrainian and Russian officials and huddling with European ministers in an attempt to bring the conflict to a conclusion. The latest meeting happened this week, when U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Steve Witkoff, Trump’s special envoy, traveled to Paris for an all-hands session.

Trump, however, doesn’t have much to show for his efforts. U.S. officials continue to put on a brave face and insist that Trump, and only Trump, has the knowledge, skill-set and experience to negotiate an end to Europe’s deadliest war in 80 years. But a confluence of factors outside of his control – namely the actions of the combatants themselves – runs the high risk of killing off Washington’s diplomatic gamble before it has a chance to succeed. Even Trump, who once boastfully declared he could solve the war in 24 hours, is getting increasingly impatient with the entire enterprise.

It’s not like the Trump administration hasn’t notched any wins on the board. Given the intractability of the warring parties, the fact that Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky was once impervious to negotiations with a tyrant like Vladimir Putin and the sheer hatred accumulated after three years of intense warfare, just getting Ukrainian and Russian officials into a diplomatic process can be labeled progress.

Yet the process hasn’t produced anything but dashed hopes. The March 11 joint statement announcing Kyiv’s support for an unconditional 30-day ceasefire was quickly rejected by Putin, who introduced a slew of questions about who would enforce it, how violators would be punished and when the core issues would be addressed.

Read at Spectator

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Eurasia

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Europe and US slide further apart on Ukraine

By Daniel DePetris

May 23, 2025

In the mediaIran, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

New US-Iran Nuclear Talks as Tensions Rise

Featuring Daniel DePetris

May 22, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine Faces A Growing Risk of Outright Military Collapse If No Deal Struck

By Daniel Davis

May 21, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Donald Trump is getting a reality check on his peace plans for Gaza and Ukraine

By Daniel DePetris

May 20, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

The Defining Test: Can Europe’s Rising Right Agree on Ukraine?

By Julian Fisher

May 20, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump should not demand a ceasefire in Putin call

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 19, 2025

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Past Virtual Event: A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved