Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / China / Washington’s two pronged approach to breaking the China-Russia partnership
China, Russia

October 25, 2023

Washington’s two pronged approach to breaking the China-Russia partnership

By Quinn Marschik

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s attendance at the China-hosted Belt and Road Forum—Putin’s first significant trip abroad since the International Criminal Court issued a warrant for his arrest—demonstrates the Russia-China “no limits” relationship is not only strong, but that Moscow is increasingly Beijing’s junior partner. Together, Russia and China are the most significant threat to the United States. Washington should leverage China’s internal politics, national interests, and nationalist ideology to weaken the Moscow-Beijing relationship and prevent an even greater threat from emerging.

The United States should start by engaging and enhancing the profiles of Chinese officials and outside advisors who do not hold favorable views toward Russia to influence Beijing’s policy. Support for Moscow’s war in Ukraine or a strong Russia-China relationship is brittle. Some prominent individuals even view Russia as a threat to China’s interests. Washington can promote their views through standard diplomatic engagement and backchanneling through track two and 1.5 diplomacy. These individuals—particularly those affiliated with state- and party-run research organizations—could then convey their analysis in concert with U.S. opinions to policy makers. But for official and unofficial diplomacy to be effective, the United States should highlight that an overly strong Russia-China relationship is harmful to Beijing’s interests.

Naturally, Washington should emphasize that China’s “neutral” stance and instances of providing lethal support to Russia’s war effort in Ukraine has harmed its economic relationships with Europe and the United States and will continue to do so. Weaker imports from and exports to the collective West will continue to lower China’s economic growth outlook and amplify social ills, such as youth unemployment. Beijing’s close relationship with Moscow also helps fuel suspicion of Chinese international investments—even relatively benign ones—leading to lost time, capital, and future economic gains.

Read at RealClearWorld

Author

Quinn
Marschik

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

In the mediaChina‑Taiwan, Asia, China

U.S. spent roughly $3.4 trillion in military competition with China between 2012 and 2024, Watson study estimates

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh, Benjamin Friedman, and Lyle Goldstein

March 10, 2026

In the mediaChina, Asia, China‑Taiwan, Taiwan

Stability comes first: Chinese defence chief signals Beijing’s strategic caution

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

March 10, 2026

Op-edChina‑Taiwan, Asia, China

Trump-Xi Taiwan talks could defuse the tinderbox

By Thomas P. Cavanna

March 6, 2026

Op-edTaiwan, Asia, China‑Taiwan

Taiwan’s Defense Budget Dilemma

By Lyle Goldstein

March 2, 2026

Op-edAsia

U.S. missile deliveries to Philippines are pointless and escalatory

By Thomas P. Cavanna

February 27, 2026

In the mediaChina‑Taiwan, Asia, China

U.S. arms sale to Taiwan clashes with Trump’s desire to strike trade deal with China

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

February 22, 2026

Events on China

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.