Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Israel-Hamas
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
    • North Korea
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / China / Washington’s two pronged approach to breaking the China-Russia partnership
China, Russia

October 25, 2023

Washington’s two pronged approach to breaking the China-Russia partnership

By Quinn Marschik

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s attendance at the China-hosted Belt and Road Forum – Putin’s first significant trip abroad since the International Criminal Court issued a warrant for his arrest – demonstrates the Russia-China “no limits” relationship is not only strong, but that Moscow is increasingly Beijing’s junior partner. Together, Russia and China are the most significant threat to the United States. Washington should leverage China’s internal politics, national interests, and nationalist ideology to weaken the Moscow-Beijing relationship and prevent an even greater threat from emerging.

The United States should start by engaging and enhancing the profiles of Chinese officials and outside advisors who do not hold favorable views toward Russia to influence Beijing’s policy. Support for Moscow’s war in Ukraine or a strong Russia-China relationship is brittle. Some prominent individuals even view Russia as a threat to China’s interests. Washington can promote their views through standard diplomatic engagement and backchanneling through track two and 1.5 diplomacy. These individuals – particularly those affiliated with state- and party-run research organizations – could then convey their analysis in concert with U.S. opinions to policy makers. But for official and unofficial diplomacy to be effective, the United States should highlight that an overly strong Russia-China relationship is harmful to Beijing’s interests.

Naturally, Washington should emphasize that China’s “neutral” stance and instances of providing lethal support to Russia’s war effort in Ukraine has harmed its economic relationships with Europe and the United States and will continue to do so. Weaker imports from and exports to the collective West will continue to lower China’s economic growth outlook and amplify social ills, such as youth unemployment. Beijing’s close relationship with Moscow also helps fuel suspicion of Chinese international investments – even relatively benign ones – leading to lost time, capital, and future economic gains.

Read at RealClearWorld

Author

Quinn
Marschik

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edAsia

The Trump administration cools off India-Pakistan conflict — for now

By Daniel DePetris

May 13, 2025

op-edChina, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power, Taiwan

China tariffs deal could backfire on Trump

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 12, 2025

op-edAsia, Air power, Nuclear weapons

Will India or Pakistan resort to the nuclear option?

By Rajan Menon

May 8, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Air power, Asia, Balance of power, Global posture, Land power, Naval power

The Pentagon Is Ignoring Its Own Strategy

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 7, 2025

ExplainerMiddle East, China, Europe and Eurasia

China can’t dominate the Middle East

By Rosemary Kelanic

May 5, 2025

In the mediaChina, Asia, Taiwan

Trump fires national security adviser, signaling new China line

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

May 2, 2025

Events on China

See All Events
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Past Virtual Event: Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024
virtualChina, Asia, Grand strategy

Past Virtual Event: Rocks, reefs, and resolve? Examining the purpose of U.S. policy in the South China Sea

December 12, 2023

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved