Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / Ukraine’s Kursk offensive: triumph or tactical misstep?
Ukraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

September 19, 2024

Ukraine’s Kursk offensive: triumph or tactical misstep?

By Gil Barndollar

KYIV, Ukraine—To bastardize Faulkner, in Ukraine’s capital, the past isn’t past: it is a soldier in the battles of the present and the future. A brand-new exhibit in Kyiv’s World War II museum, housed in the base of the towering Mother Ukraine statue, already showcases the weeks-old incursion into Russia’s Kursk district.

Dubbed Edge, the exhibit first documents, “the history of Ukrainian colonization of the Kursk, Belgorod, and Voronezh territories since the second half of the seventeenth century when the Ukrainian settlements emerged in wild fields and on Tatar trails, with Cossacks being the driving force behind it.” Photos, videos, and a handful of artifacts (the shorn nose of a Lenin statue, a bullet-scarred border sign) then celebrate Ukraine’s biggest battlefield success in many months.

Beyond the museum’s parquet floors, sentiment on the offensive is similarly triumphal. Many feel that Kursk has been a boon to Ukrainian morale. A veteran of elite Ukrainian infantry units, now fighting for structural change at Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense, told me that the operation is “kind of genius.” Soldiers from one of the offensive’s spearhead battalions who I interviewed last week, farther east, were quietly confident. Most wore unsuppressed smiles as they prepared for their next mission.

Kursk’s impact on foreign support for Ukraine is more muted. It is doubtful the offensive has had any meaningful effect on U.S. public opinion on Ukraine, at best a secondary issue for American voters in this chaotic presidential election year. One wonders whether Ukraine would have launched the operation had President Biden dropped out of the presidential race a few weeks earlier, potentially enabling Kamala Harris’ ascent to at least even electoral odds before August.

Read at The National Interest

Author

Photo of Gil Barndollar

Gil
Barndollar

Non-Resident Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Eurasia

op-edRussia, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Trump’s tough talk won’t end war in Ukraine

By Daniel DePetris

July 26, 2025

ExplainerNATO, China, Russia

Keep NATO focused on Europe, not China

By Thomas P. Cavanna

July 24, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

How Trump’s 50-day deadline threat against Putin will backfire

By Jennifer Kavanagh

July 15, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Vladimir Putin’s conduct causes Donald Trump to have a change of heart on Ukraine

By Daniel DePetris

July 15, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, Military analysis

Will Trump’s shift on arming Ukraine help end Russia’s invasion? Experts weigh in

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

July 15, 2025

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

What Trump’s Ukraine aid pause says about America’s broken foreign policy

By Daniel DePetris

July 14, 2025

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Past Virtual Event: Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Past Virtual Event: A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved