Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Venezuela
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Ukraine-Russia / Ukraine’s Kursk gamble isn’t paying off
Ukraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

November 1, 2024

Ukraine’s Kursk gamble isn’t paying off

By Daniel DePetris

Volodymyr Zelensky is a lonely man these days.

The Ukrainian president’s latest swing through Western capitals, where he met with President Joe Biden in late September and various European heads of state in October, produced little in the way of new security commitments from his foreign backers. Kyiv’s request to use Western-made missiles against targets deep in Russia remains on ice. Zelensky’s so-called “Victory Plan” hasn’t impressed anybody—it’s less of a “plan” and more like a wish-list of weapons that Ukrainian officials have been reciting every week for the last two and a half years.

The battlefield isn’t looking great for the Ukrainians either. Although the Russian army continues to take a beating—September was reportedly its deadliest month since the war began—its offensive in Donetsk is chipping away at Ukrainian defensive positions. Russian President Vladimir Putin is committed to capturing the Donbas region and more than willing to sacrifice a lot of young Russian men to do it. The strategy, however brutal, appears to be working, albeit more slowly than Putin would like. In early October, the Russian army captured Vuhledar after a months-long offensive there; this week, they took Selydove, a small town on the road to the logistical hub of Pokrovsk.

Ukraine’s August offensive into Russia’s Kursk region was supposed to prevent some of this from occurring, or at least force the Kremlin to make some difficult decisions about where to allocate its troops and resources. Zelensky’s decision caught the United States, its biggest military backer, by surprise and caused divisions within the Ukrainian military establishment. According to a September report in Politico Europe, Valery Zaluzhny, Kyiv’s top military commander during the first two years of the war, objected because he believed the plan wasn’t thought out well enough. Zelensky, however, viewed the incursion as a way to turn the tables after a year of bruising losses.

Read at Newsweek

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

op-edEurope and Eurasia, NATO

This time, Trump’s threats to Europe look deadly serious

By Daniel DePetris

January 20, 2026

op-edNATO, Europe and Eurasia

Will NATO survive Trump?

By Jennifer Kavanagh

January 20, 2026

In the mediaGlobal posture, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

The meaning of “America First” is in flux

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

January 20, 2026

op-edRussia, Ukraine‑Russia

Seizing empty Russian oil tanker doesn’t serve America’s interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh

January 8, 2026

In the mediaGrand strategy

Daniel Davis discusses the collapse of the ‘rules-based international order’ with Times of London

Featuring Daniel Davis

January 7, 2026

In the mediaGrand strategy, Europe and Eurasia, Ukraine‑Russia

Daniel Davis critiques the ‘coalition of the willing’ in Ukraine-Russia war: LBC

Featuring Daniel Davis

January 6, 2026

Events on Ukraine-Russia

See All Events
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Air power, Diplomacy, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Land power, Military analysis, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine’s critical choice: Pursue peace or fight on

April 16, 2025
virtualUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Trump and Ukraine: Prolonging or ending the war

December 13, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved