Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
  • Analysis
    • Policy Papers
    • Symposia
    • Q&A
    • Polls
    • Grand Strategy Explained
    • Target Taiwan
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Europe and Eurasia / The U.S. Lost Hungary But The Interference Continues
Europe and Eurasia, NATO

April 25, 2026

The U.S. Lost Hungary But The Interference Continues

By Thomas Cavanna

After 16 years in power, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán suffered a massive defeat in Hungary’s April 12 parliamentary election. Many observers have described the outcome as a stern ideological rebuke of the Trump administration, which lobbied heavily in Orbán’s favor, and have argued that Orbán’s defeat would allow the EU to bolster its support for Ukraine and assert its strategic autonomy.

Yet, the Trump administration’s aggressive political interference agenda is likely to persist and could further weaken the foundations of European strategic autonomy.

Hungary’s election was a setback for Washington. President Trump urged Hungarians to support Orbán and promised to mobilize America’s “full economic might” to help his regime. He also sent Vice President J.D. Vance to attend pro-Orbán rallies, marking the most senior U.S. official’s visit to Hungary since 2006.

Orbán was the first European leader to endorse Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, forging a bond that deepened during the Biden era. His illiberal governance was a source of inspiration. More broadly, many on the American right admired his resistance to the EU, his close ties to Russia, and his efforts to make Hungary a global conservative stronghold.

Yet this setback may not derail the Trump administration’s agenda of political interference abroad. Although the U.S. has a long (and violent) record in that domain, President Trump has interfered more heavily in other countries’ internal affairs than most of his predecessors.

Read at Modern Diplomacy

Author

Thomas
Cavanna

Former Non-Resident Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

In the mediaGrand strategy, NATO

As The CIA Director Warns Putin Not to Take Advantage of U.S. Munitions Shortages, Europe Moves Away From Dependence on American Weapons and Security Guarantees

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

August 31, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, NATO, Russia, Ukraine

Russia does not want a war with Europe

By Jennifer Kavanagh

August 28, 2026

Op-edNATO, Europe and Eurasia

Leave Europe to the Europeans

By Jennifer Kavanagh

August 28, 2026

ExplainerTaiwan, Asia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

Accommodation: An underutilized strategy for great-power rivals

By Moritz Graefrath

August 27, 2026

In the mediaNATO, Europe and Eurasia

Don’t Freak Out Over the Pentagon’s Europe Plans

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

August 27, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Zelensky is running out of political cover

By Jennifer Kavanagh

August 20, 2026

Events on Europe and Eurasia

See All Events
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia

What’s Next for U.S. Foreign Policy in 2026? Europe Edition

January 14, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Experts
  • Papers
  • Symposia
  • Q&A
  • Polls
  • Events
  • Media
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • Donate
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.