Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / China / Trump is surrounded by China hawks
China, Asia, Grand strategy

November 14, 2024

Trump is surrounded by China hawks

By Daniel DePetris

If the old Washington, D.C., adage that “personnel is policy” applies, Chinese President Xi Jinping has his work cut out for him over the next four years.

It didn’t take long after the 2024 presidential election for President-elect Donald Trump to begin vetting candidates for his second administration. While thousands of low- and mid-ranking jobs are still open, Trump has already assembled the core of his senior national security team. Marco Rubio, the senior senator from Florida who ran against Trump during the 2016 Republican presidential primary, is his pick for secretary of state. Michael Waltz, a special forces veteran and congressman from Florida, was tapped to be national security adviser. Elise Stefanik, a congresswoman representing part of upstate New York, is preparing to set up shop at the United Nations as America’s permanent representative. And Robert Lighthizer, Trump’s former trade representative, will likely join the second Trump administration in some senior capacity.

All four of them are considered China hawks. And depending on how much leeway Trump gives them, all four will have the power to push U.S. policy on China in a direction that, if taken to the extreme, will not only limit any diplomatic openings with the Asian superpower but potentially increase the prospect of a conflict between the world’s two largest economies.

If he’s offered a senior role, Lighthizer, a respected trade lawyer with decent contacts on Capitol Hill, will stick with the economic aspect of the China challenge. Much like Trump, Lighthizer is a fan of tariffs and an architect of the Trump administration’s trade war with Beijing during the first term, which hiked duties on hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of Chinese products in an attempt to pressure China into a new trade agreement. In 2020, the U.S. and China finally signed a new deal requiring Beijing to import another $200 billion in U.S. goods. China didn’t live up to the terms.

Read at Newsweek

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

In the mediaGrand strategy, Asia

‘Restrainers’ propose slashing U.S. troop numbers in South Korea, Okinawa

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Great power competition

What is Trump’s “new realism” in foreign policy?

By Lyle Goldstein

July 4, 2025

In the mediaChina, Asia, Taiwan

American bombs in Iran also reverberate in China and North Korea

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

July 4, 2025

op-edNATO, Alliances, Asia

Why America’s East Asian allies skipped the NATO summit

By Lyle Goldstein

July 2, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Iran, North Korea, Russia

There is no ‘axis of autocracy’

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

Events on China

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Past Virtual Event: Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved