Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / NATO / Trump has a new European target in his crosshairs
NATO, Europe and Eurasia

October 17, 2025

Trump has a new European target in his crosshairs

By Daniel DePetris

There was a time not so long ago when Germany was US president Donald Trump’s favourite punching bag in Europe. During his first term in office, Trump had a penchant for biting Berlin’s ear off, blasting its political leadership as grossly incompetent, blaming the country for destroying itself by accepting a million refugees and wagging his finger at the Germans’ unwillingness to take more responsibility for their own defence.

Yet those days are over. Trump, now in his second term, has a new European target in his crosshairs: Spain.

The land of Tempranillo and Jamón Serrano is the latest subject of Trumpian rage, and the issues at hand—inadequate defence spending and insufficient commitment to Europe’s collective defence—are the very same that caused such frigidness between the Americans and Germans. The Spanish government of left-of-centre prime minister Pedro Sánchez is, in the Trump administration’s view, not only refusing to meet the defence obligations it signed up to, but also injecting a schism in Nato at a time when the alliance is working toward implementing defence reforms—chief among them an increase in military expenditures to 5 per cent of gross domestic product by 2035.

Trump has a point. At 1.43 per cent of GDP, Spain had the second-lowest defence spending in Nato last year, behind only Luxembourg. Yes, the Spanish have committed themselves to beefing this figure up to 2 per cent of GDP by the end of the year, which will mean another €10 billion (£8.7 billion) or so into the coffers. But for Trump, a man obsessed with numbers and balance sheets, this is too little, too late. Again, he has a point; the 2 per cent of GDP benchmark prime minister Sánchez is so proud about fulfilling is no longer a target worth pursuing. In fact, Nato made a collective decision during last June’s annual summit that 2 per cent was inadequate to the task of beefing up European military capacity in the face of Russia’s continued aggression in Ukraine.

Read at Spectator

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Europe

Op-edNuclear weapons, Europe and Eurasia, Russia

Russia Is Offering An Informal Nuclear Deal. Washington Should Take It.

By John Grover

February 25, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Breaking Europe’s Trans-Atlantic Habit: The End of the Senior Partner Myth

By Moritz Graefrath

February 24, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Ukraine‑Russia

Europe debates the bomb

By Daniel DePetris

February 19, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Marco Rubio’s Munich speech was an ultimatum to Europe

By Jennifer Kavanagh

February 15, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine and Russia are both suffering as the war enters its fifth year

By Daniel DePetris

February 10, 2026

Op-edGrand strategy, Greenland, NATO, Western Hemisphere

Donald Trump is endangering U.S. alliances

By Christopher McCallion

January 30, 2026

Events on NATO

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

A ‘bridge’ to NATO or false hope for Ukraine?

July 12, 2024
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.